Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3509: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.153827159587686

Latest revision as of 12:27, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3509_Fibroblast_Keratocytes_Myoblast_tridermal_Smooth_optic_embryonic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:71146436..71146447,-p3@LARP6
Hg19::chr15:71146461..71146475,-p2@LARP6
Hg19::chr15:71146480..71146531,-p1@LARP6


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cell layer2.78e-20309
epithelium7.62e-20306
multi-tissue structure1.16e-17342
dense mesenchyme tissue4.00e-1673
paraxial mesoderm7.30e-1672
presumptive paraxial mesoderm7.30e-1672
somite9.59e-1671
presomitic mesoderm9.59e-1671
presumptive segmental plate9.59e-1671
dermomyotome9.59e-1671
trunk paraxial mesoderm9.59e-1671
anatomical cluster1.07e-15373
epithelial vesicle2.06e-1578
skeletal muscle tissue3.57e-1562
striated muscle tissue3.57e-1562
myotome3.57e-1562
anatomical conduit6.08e-15240
tube1.10e-14192
multilaminar epithelium1.88e-1483
muscle tissue4.00e-1464
musculature4.00e-1464
musculature of body4.00e-1464
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.35e-14132
mesenchyme1.41e-13160
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.41e-13160
multi-cellular organism3.80e-13656
artery9.62e-1342
arterial blood vessel9.62e-1342
arterial system9.62e-1342
organism subdivision1.04e-12264
trunk mesenchyme5.48e-12122
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm8.24e-1283
anatomical system1.40e-11624
trunk1.40e-11199
systemic artery1.41e-1133
systemic arterial system1.41e-1133
anatomical group2.61e-11625
vasculature3.00e-1178
vascular system3.00e-1178
epithelial tube open at both ends1.02e-1059
blood vessel1.02e-1059
blood vasculature1.02e-1059
vascular cord1.02e-1059
unilaminar epithelium9.48e-10148
vessel1.05e-0968
epithelial tube1.39e-09117
circulatory system3.91e-09112
cardiovascular system8.99e-09109
neural plate4.26e-0882
presumptive neural plate4.26e-0882
neurectoderm5.53e-0886
embryo9.28e-08592
ectoderm-derived structure1.98e-07171
ectoderm1.98e-07171
presumptive ectoderm1.98e-07171
developing anatomical structure3.91e-07581
ecto-epithelium5.08e-07104
brain6.69e-0768
future brain6.69e-0768
nervous system7.12e-0789


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.12.05336
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.16.45108
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.12.67616
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.04561
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.668628
MA0074.13.54511
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.11.55947
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.752137
MA0146.17.1063
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.22.74132
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.22.07067
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.838867
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.110.1524
MA0163.11.84145
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.26.90173
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324599364023192



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.