Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3206

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:59, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3206_Mesenchymal_Osteoblast_tenocyte_Synoviocyte_Alveolar_Fibroblast_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:842826..842881,+p1@TSPAN4
Hg19::chr11:842903..842923,+p5@TSPAN4
Hg19::chr11:842928..842980,+p3@TSPAN4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk mesenchyme1.13e-19143
somite8.43e-1983
paraxial mesoderm8.43e-1983
presomitic mesoderm8.43e-1983
presumptive segmental plate8.43e-1983
trunk paraxial mesoderm8.43e-1983
presumptive paraxial mesoderm8.43e-1983
dermomyotome2.93e-1870
trunk1.23e-17216
multilaminar epithelium2.20e-1782
mesenchyme2.21e-16238
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.21e-16238
skeletal muscle tissue6.94e-1661
striated muscle tissue6.94e-1661
myotome6.94e-1661
muscle tissue3.83e-1563
musculature3.83e-1563
musculature of body3.83e-1563
vasculature4.37e-1579
vascular system4.37e-1579
unilaminar epithelium1.85e-14138
epithelial tube4.18e-14118
vessel8.20e-1269
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.02e-1184
mesoderm1.65e-11448
mesoderm-derived structure1.65e-11448
presumptive mesoderm1.65e-11448
blood vessel1.14e-1060
epithelial tube open at both ends1.14e-1060
blood vasculature1.14e-1060
vascular cord1.14e-1060
artery2.64e-1042
arterial blood vessel2.64e-1042
arterial system2.64e-1042
organism subdivision7.63e-10365
multi-tissue structure1.09e-09347
multi-cellular organism3.62e-09659
cardiovascular system5.91e-09110
cell layer1.04e-08312
systemic artery1.72e-0833
systemic arterial system1.72e-0833
circulatory system2.00e-08113
epithelium2.57e-08309
surface structure2.96e-0895
anatomical system6.65e-08625
anatomical group1.07e-07626
integument6.80e-0745
integumental system6.80e-0745


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.