Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1517

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:05, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1517_Fibroblast_Preadipocyte_Adipocyte_basal_bone_Osteoblast_pleomorphic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:99357430..99357445,+p1@COL8A1
Hg19::chr3:99463740..99463765,+p5@COL8A1
Hg19::chr3:99509555..99509574,+p3@COL8A1
Hg19::chr3:99509604..99509650,+p2@COL8A1
Hg19::chr3:99514880..99514892,+p@chr3:99514880..99514892
+
Hg19::chr3:99514927..99514940,+p@chr3:99514927..99514940
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision5.61e-22365
vasculature6.41e-2079
vascular system6.41e-2079
anatomical cluster1.61e-18286
cell layer5.09e-18312
epithelium1.90e-17309
multi-cellular organism3.98e-16659
somite5.17e-1683
paraxial mesoderm5.17e-1683
presomitic mesoderm5.17e-1683
presumptive segmental plate5.17e-1683
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.17e-1683
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.17e-1683
multi-tissue structure1.14e-15347
epithelial tube1.41e-15118
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.76e-1584
vessel3.10e-1569
trunk mesenchyme7.88e-15143
blood vessel3.67e-1460
epithelial tube open at both ends3.67e-1460
blood vasculature3.67e-1460
vascular cord3.67e-1460
circulatory system6.68e-14113
cardiovascular system8.93e-14110
trunk9.80e-14216
dermomyotome1.97e-1370
anatomical conduit4.63e-13241
skeletal muscle tissue5.87e-1361
striated muscle tissue5.87e-1361
myotome5.87e-1361
unilaminar epithelium5.90e-13138
muscle tissue1.03e-1263
musculature1.03e-1263
musculature of body1.03e-1263
anatomical system1.24e-12625
anatomical group2.23e-12626
multilaminar epithelium2.30e-1282
artery2.11e-1142
arterial blood vessel2.11e-1142
arterial system2.11e-1142
tube1.87e-10194
mesenchyme2.94e-10238
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.94e-10238
surface structure6.48e-1095
integument2.03e-0845
integumental system2.03e-0845
systemic artery2.19e-0833
systemic arterial system2.19e-0833
skin of body6.34e-0840
embryonic structure4.05e-07605
developing anatomical structure4.05e-07605
germ layer4.30e-07604
embryonic tissue4.30e-07604
presumptive structure4.30e-07604
epiblast (generic)4.30e-07604
embryo5.49e-07612
compound organ7.29e-0769


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.