MCL coexpression mm9:1670

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

	Short description
Mm9::chr14:79790473..79790550,-	p1@Naa16
Mm9::chr15:102236700..102236764,+	p1@Sp1
Mm9::chr1:152240400..152240541,+	p1@Tpr
Mm9::chr9:100543991..100544020,+	p2@Stag1
Mm9::chr9:100544024..100544045,+	p1@Stag1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

GO ID	GO name	FDR corrected p-value
GO:0060134	prepulse inhibition	0.0351158149807998
GO:0048585	negative regulation of response to stimulus	0.0351158149807998
GO:0032102	negative regulation of response to external stimulus	0.0351158149807998
GO:0032101	regulation of response to external stimulus	0.0351158149807998
GO:0001964	startle response	0.0374507120195016
GO:0005234	extracellular-glutamate-gated ion channel activity	0.0401125708475028
GO:0004970	ionotropic glutamate receptor activity	0.0401125708475028
GO:0003690	double-stranded DNA binding	0.0409415170819246

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:

---

"{{{coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median}}}" is not a number.

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n

TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}