Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4811

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:16, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4811_Fibroblast_extraskeletal_leiomyoma_Smooth_giant_mesenchymal_Synoviocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:18474125..18474160,+p1@ADAMTSL1
Hg19::chr9:18474163..18474202,+p2@ADAMTSL1
Hg19::chr9:18474204..18474215,+p3@ADAMTSL1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
dense mesenchyme tissue2.93e-2373
somite3.65e-2371
presomitic mesoderm3.65e-2371
presumptive segmental plate3.65e-2371
dermomyotome3.65e-2371
trunk paraxial mesoderm3.65e-2371
paraxial mesoderm5.40e-2372
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.40e-2372
vasculature5.64e-2378
vascular system5.64e-2378
epithelial vesicle1.47e-2278
vessel5.04e-2068
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm9.82e-2083
multilaminar epithelium1.78e-1983
skeletal muscle tissue3.46e-1962
striated muscle tissue3.46e-1962
myotome3.46e-1962
muscle tissue3.93e-1964
musculature3.93e-1964
musculature of body3.93e-1964
epithelial tube open at both ends3.20e-1859
blood vessel3.20e-1859
blood vasculature3.20e-1859
vascular cord3.20e-1859
cardiovascular system9.28e-17109
unilaminar epithelium1.74e-16148
circulatory system2.18e-16112
artery6.83e-1542
arterial blood vessel6.83e-1542
arterial system6.83e-1542
mesenchyme2.26e-14160
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.26e-14160
trunk mesenchyme3.33e-13122
epithelial tube6.66e-13117
integument9.30e-1346
integumental system9.30e-1346
cell layer2.20e-12309
systemic artery3.70e-1233
systemic arterial system3.70e-1233
multi-cellular organism4.11e-12656
epithelium5.72e-12306
surface structure7.54e-1299
skin of body2.40e-1141
organism subdivision4.46e-11264
anatomical system6.58e-11624
anatomical group1.02e-10625
anatomical cluster8.87e-10373
multi-tissue structure1.61e-09342
aorta9.71e-0921
aortic system9.71e-0921
mesoderm1.72e-08315
mesoderm-derived structure1.72e-08315
presumptive mesoderm1.72e-08315
trunk1.83e-07199
blood vessel endothelium6.00e-0718
endothelium6.00e-0718
cardiovascular system endothelium6.00e-0718
anatomical conduit6.58e-07240
adipose tissue8.28e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0168633128821131
GATA2#2624312.7449317335540.0004829527704283790.00439326751944687
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.0077205911243373



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.