Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3012

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:38, 18 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3012_cerebellum_medulla_amygdala_hippocampus_occipital_middle_parietal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:3146868..3146929,+p3@PFKP
Hg19::chr17:42852832..42852834,+p@chr17:42852832..42852834
+
Hg19::chr2:39892216..39892229,+p17@TMEM178


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:00059456-phosphofructokinase complex0.0324059715622019
GO:00038726-phosphofructokinase activity0.0324059715622019
GO:0008443phosphofructokinase activity0.0324059715622019
GO:0019200carbohydrate kinase activity0.0391192555970231
GO:0005923tight junction0.0391192555970231
GO:0043296apical junction complex0.0391192555970231
GO:0016327apicolateral plasma membrane0.0391192555970231
GO:0006096glycolysis0.0391192555970231
GO:0006007glucose catabolic process0.0391192555970231
GO:0019320hexose catabolic process0.0391192555970231
GO:0046365monosaccharide catabolic process0.0391192555970231
GO:0046164alcohol catabolic process0.0391192555970231
GO:0005911intercellular junction0.0391192555970231
GO:0044275cellular carbohydrate catabolic process0.0391192555970231
GO:0044445cytosolic part0.0391192555970231
GO:0016052carbohydrate catabolic process0.0391192555970231
GO:0006006glucose metabolic process0.0391192555970231
GO:0019318hexose metabolic process0.0498895153906516
GO:0005996monosaccharide metabolic process0.0498895153906516



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.