Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2490

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:20, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2490_Olfactory_mesothelioma_Hair_leiomyoma_mesenchymal_papillary_tenocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:41765476..41765492,+p@chr19:41765476..41765492
+
Hg19::chr19:41765598..41765618,+p5@AXL
Hg19::chr19:41765634..41765656,+p7@AXL
Hg19::chr19:41765859..41765888,+p6@AXL


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision7.68e-18365
trunk mesenchyme4.57e-17143
multi-tissue structure1.40e-15347
cell layer1.65e-14312
somite5.25e-1483
paraxial mesoderm5.25e-1483
presomitic mesoderm5.25e-1483
presumptive segmental plate5.25e-1483
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.25e-1483
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.25e-1483
epithelium9.53e-14309
surface structure2.50e-1395
multi-cellular organism2.98e-13659
trunk8.97e-13216
multilaminar epithelium4.36e-1282
anatomical cluster8.73e-12286
dermomyotome4.11e-1170
mesenchyme4.19e-11238
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.19e-11238
anatomical system1.99e-10625
artery3.13e-1042
arterial blood vessel3.13e-1042
arterial system3.13e-1042
anatomical group3.33e-10626
unilaminar epithelium3.64e-10138
epithelial tube4.53e-10118
vasculature9.94e-1079
vascular system9.94e-1079
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.32e-0984
blood vessel8.41e-0960
epithelial tube open at both ends8.41e-0960
blood vasculature8.41e-0960
vascular cord8.41e-0960
skin of body1.61e-0840
skeletal muscle tissue1.79e-0861
striated muscle tissue1.79e-0861
myotome1.79e-0861
integument1.98e-0845
integumental system1.98e-0845
muscle tissue2.00e-0863
musculature2.00e-0863
musculature of body2.00e-0863
vessel5.12e-0869
organ part1.11e-07219
systemic artery1.98e-0733
systemic arterial system1.98e-0733
intermediate mesoderm2.51e-0737
anatomical conduit3.17e-07241
embryo3.53e-07612
embryonic structure5.72e-07605
developing anatomical structure5.72e-07605
germ layer6.62e-07604
embryonic tissue6.62e-07604
presumptive structure6.62e-07604
epiblast (generic)6.62e-07604


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.