Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3854

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:50, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3854_anaplastic_Cardiac_Mesothelial_mesothelioma_mesenchymal_Smooth_squamous



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:12679045..12679065,-p@chr1:12679045..12679065
-
Hg19::chr1:12679075..12679086,-p@chr1:12679075..12679086
-
Hg19::chr1:12679100..12679121,-p@chr1:12679100..12679121
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial tube1.47e-19118
artery3.26e-1442
arterial blood vessel3.26e-1442
arterial system3.26e-1442
unilaminar epithelium2.34e-13138
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.73e-1384
systemic artery2.95e-1233
systemic arterial system2.95e-1233
blood vessel3.75e-1260
epithelial tube open at both ends3.75e-1260
blood vasculature3.75e-1260
vascular cord3.75e-1260
mesoderm4.74e-12448
mesoderm-derived structure4.74e-12448
presumptive mesoderm4.74e-12448
circulatory system1.67e-11113
vessel2.02e-1169
vasculature4.94e-1179
vascular system4.94e-1179
cardiovascular system1.36e-10110
anatomical conduit1.47e-10241
trunk mesenchyme2.01e-10143
trunk2.54e-10216
muscle tissue1.46e-0963
musculature1.46e-0963
musculature of body1.46e-0963
skeletal muscle tissue3.52e-0961
striated muscle tissue3.52e-0961
myotome3.52e-0961
multi-cellular organism1.11e-08659
anatomical system1.89e-08625
anatomical group3.15e-08626
intermediate mesoderm3.98e-0837
anatomical cluster4.42e-08286
compound organ7.30e-0869
mesenchyme7.71e-08238
entire embryonic mesenchyme7.71e-08238
tube1.51e-07194
lateral plate mesoderm2.74e-07216


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BHLHE40#8553344.87181354697741.10603738662898e-050.000284585953737729
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115230605190455
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0322271510430654
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0320696560041235
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0462404850684813
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.016746475054847
ESR1#2099330.76860329615453.43136389821584e-050.000676549394309541
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00897629479065518
FOSL1#8061339.7135797163731.59554825631833e-050.00037113021011499
FOSL2#2355316.93020060456170.0002060162053171620.0024306514309895
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.00581253645195374
FOXA2#3170324.63046375266526.68983856509345e-050.00107225299247973
GABPB1#255337.067683836182170.002832212825417420.0154155448860627
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.00391328368328375
HNF4A#3172323.13229036295378.07584663437677e-050.00122806253151962
HNF4G#3174328.75342252644684.20470658818262e-050.000756868926858333
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00444228213107465
JUNB#3726330.61063265982113.4847716247536e-050.00068052741906814
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156803131605878
MAFK#7975327.10073313782995.02195559325033e-050.000857567070313067
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0186540435232198
NR3C1#2908314.9730233311730.0002978331194675480.00309045138242139
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.00767672702731061
RXRA#6256320.07461713913330.0001235730348432220.00165247684839838
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0276823015947759
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00309056215178124
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0246563766100532
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00613914250182467
TRIM28#10155318.59052504526250.0001555969297255280.00197069945956881
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140224772313121
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109429440036211



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.