Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4662

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:08, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4662_caudate_thymus_acute_putamen_occipital_globus_nucleus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:142552033..142552082,+p@chr7:142552033..142552082
+
Hg19::chr7:142552394..142552413,+p3@EPHB6
Hg19::chr7:142552472..142552493,+p4@EPHB6


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cerebral hemisphere3.72e-3032
telencephalon2.45e-2934
brain grey matter1.05e-2834
gray matter1.05e-2834
regional part of telencephalon1.06e-2732
regional part of forebrain2.06e-2641
forebrain2.06e-2641
anterior neural tube2.06e-2641
future forebrain2.06e-2641
regional part of cerebral cortex1.75e-2522
neural tube3.04e-2456
neural rod3.04e-2456
future spinal cord3.04e-2456
neural keel3.04e-2456
regional part of nervous system1.48e-2353
regional part of brain1.48e-2353
neocortex1.77e-2320
cerebral cortex1.56e-2125
pallium1.56e-2125
central nervous system6.13e-2181
adult organism5.97e-20114
brain6.52e-1968
future brain6.52e-1968
nervous system2.56e-1789
pre-chordal neural plate6.48e-1761
neural plate8.36e-1582
presumptive neural plate8.36e-1582
neurectoderm1.67e-1386
ecto-epithelium9.97e-10104
basal ganglion1.14e-099
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.14e-099
aggregate regional part of brain1.14e-099
collection of basal ganglia1.14e-099
cerebral subcortex1.14e-099
gyrus7.38e-096
neural nucleus1.41e-089
nucleus of brain1.41e-089
blood3.49e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid3.49e-0815
organism substance3.49e-0815
telencephalic nucleus1.21e-077
occipital lobe1.30e-075
parietal lobe1.38e-075
temporal lobe5.89e-076
limbic system6.74e-075
corpus striatum8.63e-074
striatum8.63e-074
ventral part of telencephalon8.63e-074
future corpus striatum8.63e-074


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
GATA1#2623313.56030814380040.0004009615963782630.00389399555180858
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.010941820513184



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.