Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1430

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:55, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1430_neuroectodermal_aorta_Hepatic_Adipocyte_Osteoblast_normal_penis



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:19287845..19287848,-p@chr17:19287845..19287848
-
Hg19::chr17:19287919..19287929,-p@chr17:19287919..19287929
-
Hg19::chr17:19287960..19287972,-p@chr17:19287960..19287972
-
Hg19::chr17:19287990..19288000,-p@chr17:19287990..19288000
-
Hg19::chr17:19288017..19288030,-p@chr17:19288017..19288030
-
Hg19::chr17:19289755..19289772,-p@chr17:19289755..19289772
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast3.26e-1276
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure9.31e-0899
omentum7.96e-076
peritoneum7.96e-076
abdominal cavity7.96e-076
visceral peritoneum7.96e-076
intestine8.33e-0717
integument9.16e-0746
integumental system9.16e-0746
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
neuroectodermal tumor5.87e-0810


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.73878
MA0004.13.45359
MA0006.10.391183
MA0007.10.539222
MA0009.11.03681
MA0014.10.491287
MA0017.10.432438
MA0019.10.7124
MA0024.10.929647
MA0025.11.17262
MA0027.12.65688
MA0028.10.408079
MA0029.10.949428
MA0030.10.937696
MA0031.10.871496
MA0038.10.665566
MA0040.10.955415
MA0041.10.578072
MA0042.10.544748
MA0043.11.03713
MA0046.11.02569
MA0048.13.56533
MA0050.10.545671
MA0051.10.661179
MA0052.10.959373
MA0055.10.465994
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.450439
MA0058.16.45045
MA0059.14.07239
MA0060.10.267412
MA0061.10.23892
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.66601
MA0067.11.35893
MA0068.10.199491
MA0069.11.02175
MA0070.11.01032
MA0071.10.625297
MA0072.11.00572
MA0073.10.00076337
MA0074.10.660398
MA0076.10.475586
MA0077.10.997832
MA0078.13.0101
MA0081.10.457725
MA0083.11.04447
MA0084.11.5477
MA0087.11.00322
MA0088.10.32124
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.490736
MA0091.14.66306
MA0092.11.29635
MA0093.15.90743
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.679972
MA0101.10.397846
MA0103.10.993014
MA0105.10.830067
MA0106.10.70837
MA0107.10.320267
MA0108.20.868347
MA0109.10
MA0111.12.17722
MA0113.10.725375
MA0114.10.314898
MA0115.11.28169
MA0116.10.865577
MA0117.11.07516
MA0119.12.92176
MA0122.11.10154
MA0124.11.23968
MA0125.11.15445
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.782708
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.06778
MA0136.10.672893
MA0139.12.62599
MA0140.10.622527
MA0141.10.455728
MA0142.10.838805
MA0143.10.725558
MA0144.10.299851
MA0145.10.707171
MA0146.10.441872
MA0147.11.57246
MA0148.10.584698
MA0149.10.612449
MA0062.20.23336
MA0035.20.621793
MA0039.20.00570825
MA0138.20.765223
MA0002.20.255126
MA0137.20.414885
MA0104.22.08061
MA0047.20.695777
MA0112.21.12726
MA0065.20.109623
MA0150.10.484557
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.629368
MA0153.11.13732
MA0154.10.819655
MA0155.11.60937
MA0156.10.417278
MA0157.10.810597
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.328286
MA0160.10.600559
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0383129
MA0163.10.273773
MA0164.10.738243
MA0080.20.394469
MA0018.20.709805
MA0099.20.629739
MA0079.20.000444266
MA0102.21.58513
MA0258.10.289793
MA0259.10.336472
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203355.644951438519330.0003688138931814860.00367053117876703
GATA1#2623511.30025678650041.22736455569136e-050.000305201730552024
REST#597858.041690596773356.54774545315482e-050.0010616984744326
USF1#739155.30124939767330.0005003327549858890.00441187543042648



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.