Coexpression cluster:C1077: Difference between revisions
From FANTOM5_SSTAR
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{ | |||
Latest revision as of 11:37, 17 September 2013
Full id: C1077_thymus_CD8_Natural_blood_NK_Peripheral_acute
Phase1 CAGE Peaks
Hg19::chr2:87014966..87014973,- | p@chr2:87014966..87014973 - |
Hg19::chr2:87016482..87016502,- | p@chr2:87016482..87016502 - |
Hg19::chr2:87017652..87017670,- | p@chr2:87017652..87017670 - |
Hg19::chr2:87017971..87017982,- | p4@CD8A |
Hg19::chr2:87017985..87018050,- | p1@CD8A |
Hg19::chr2:87018060..87018074,- | p2@CD8A |
Hg19::chr2:87018470..87018477,- | p7@CD8A |
Hg19::chr2:87088995..87089018,- | p1@CD8B |
Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data
p.value | FDR | nGenes | nPathway | Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
2.25318768070372e-05 | 0.00285253560377091 | 2 | 136 | Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) (KEGG):04514 |
7.37072179210596e-06 | 0.00198248117124819 | 2 | 78 | Antigen processing and presentation (KEGG):04612 |
9.39564536136585e-06 | 0.00198248117124819 | 2 | 88 | Hematopoietic cell lineage (KEGG):04640 |
1.41818283432528e-05 | 0.00224427433531976 | 2 | 108 | T cell receptor signaling pathway (KEGG):04660 |
1.46039942267834e-06 | 0.000924432834555386 | 2 | 35 | Primary immunodeficiency (KEGG):05340 |
0.000319827473566556 | 0.0337417984612716 | 2 | 511 | Signaling in Immune system (Reactome):REACT_6900 |
Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data
GO ID | GO name | FDR corrected p-value |
---|---|---|
GO:0042288 | MHC class I protein binding | 1.94443489268243e-06 |
GO:0042101 | T cell receptor complex | 1.94443489268243e-06 |
GO:0015026 | coreceptor activity | 2.00335716215766e-06 |
GO:0001772 | immunological synapse | 2.00335716215766e-06 |
GO:0042287 | MHC protein binding | 2.98146683544639e-06 |
GO:0042110 | T cell activation | 4.66762578026242e-05 |
GO:0043235 | receptor complex | 5.04627150719965e-05 |
GO:0046649 | lymphocyte activation | 8.79046607733516e-05 |
GO:0045321 | leukocyte activation | 0.000105470862360653 |
GO:0001775 | cell activation | 0.000117549927603074 |
GO:0007169 | transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway | 0.000117549927603074 |
GO:0007167 | enzyme linked receptor protein signaling pathway | 0.000220221982163654 |
GO:0005102 | receptor binding | 0.00243469536960991 |
GO:0006955 | immune response | 0.00297248539808496 |
GO:0005887 | integral to plasma membrane | 0.00332669934433345 |
GO:0031226 | intrinsic to plasma membrane | 0.00332669934433345 |
GO:0002376 | immune system process | 0.00332669934433345 |
GO:0044459 | plasma membrane part | 0.00854199414041754 |
GO:0007166 | cell surface receptor linked signal transduction | 0.00917490442452626 |
GO:0043234 | protein complex | 0.0122393426537342 |
GO:0004872 | receptor activity | 0.0133734696582529 |
GO:0004871 | signal transducer activity | 0.017635448063124 |
GO:0060089 | molecular transducer activity | 0.017635448063124 |
GO:0005886 | plasma membrane | 0.0177636571829853 |
GO:0032991 | macromolecular complex | 0.0177636571829853 |
GO:0007165 | signal transduction | 0.0299540671128367 |
GO:0019882 | antigen processing and presentation | 0.0305786064897416 |
GO:0007154 | cell communication | 0.0325209261041257 |
GO:0016021 | integral to membrane | 0.0444991702929945 |
GO:0031224 | intrinsic to membrane | 0.0444991702929945 |
Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>
Ontology term | p-value | n |
---|---|---|
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell | 2.49e-32 | 11 |
mature alpha-beta T cell | 5.12e-22 | 18 |
alpha-beta T cell | 5.12e-22 | 18 |
immature T cell | 5.12e-22 | 18 |
mature T cell | 5.12e-22 | 18 |
immature alpha-beta T cell | 5.12e-22 | 18 |
T cell | 1.49e-20 | 25 |
pro-T cell | 1.49e-20 | 25 |
leukocyte | 8.18e-13 | 136 |
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell | 2.17e-12 | 52 |
lymphocyte | 4.51e-12 | 53 |
common lymphoid progenitor | 4.51e-12 | 53 |
nongranular leukocyte | 6.05e-12 | 115 |
nucleate cell | 1.80e-11 | 55 |
natural killer cell | 1.38e-09 | 3 |
pro-NK cell | 1.38e-09 | 3 |
single nucleate cell | 3.21e-09 | 3 |
mononuclear cell | 3.21e-09 | 3 |
basophil | 6.57e-09 | 3 |
hematopoietic stem cell | 7.15e-09 | 168 |
angioblastic mesenchymal cell | 7.15e-09 | 168 |
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell | 2.67e-08 | 120 |
hematopoietic cell | 4.89e-08 | 177 |
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell | 2.93e-07 | 161 |
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell | 2.93e-07 | 161 |
Ontology term | p-value | n |
---|---|---|
blood | 3.20e-25 | 15 |
haemolymphatic fluid | 3.20e-25 | 15 |
organism substance | 3.20e-25 | 15 |
adult organism | 7.61e-21 | 114 |
hemolymphoid system | 1.60e-11 | 108 |
hematopoietic system | 4.95e-11 | 98 |
blood island | 4.95e-11 | 98 |
hemopoietic organ | 2.76e-10 | 7 |
immune organ | 2.76e-10 | 7 |
thymus | 2.58e-07 | 4 |
hemolymphoid system gland | 2.58e-07 | 4 |
thymic region | 2.58e-07 | 4 |
pharyngeal gland | 2.58e-07 | 4 |
thymus primordium | 2.58e-07 | 4 |
neck | 5.61e-07 | 10 |
chordate pharynx | 7.55e-07 | 10 |
pharyngeal region of foregut | 7.55e-07 | 10 |
Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data
Novel motifs
JASPAR motifs
Motifs | -log10(p-value) |
---|---|
MA0003.1 | 1.66566 |
MA0004.1 | 0.455723 |
MA0006.1 | 0.300178 |
MA0007.1 | 0.437331 |
MA0009.1 | 0.918715 |
MA0014.1 | 1.03236 |
MA0017.1 | 0.337901 |
MA0019.1 | 0.602411 |
MA0024.1 | 0.813542 |
MA0025.1 | 1.05265 |
MA0027.1 | 2.5321 |
MA0028.1 | 0.315574 |
MA0029.1 | 0.832916 |
MA0030.1 | 0.821423 |
MA0031.1 | 0.756713 |
MA0038.1 | 0.557409 |
MA0040.1 | 0.838784 |
MA0041.1 | 0.474018 |
MA0042.1 | 0.442535 |
MA0043.1 | 0.919032 |
MA0046.1 | 0.90778 |
MA0048.1 | 0.653157 |
MA0050.1 | 0.443405 |
MA0051.1 | 0.553205 |
MA0052.1 | 0.842664 |
MA0055.1 | 1.64271 |
MA0056.1 | 0 |
MA0057.1 | 0.632427 |
MA0058.1 | 0.362328 |
MA0059.1 | 0.361075 |
MA0060.1 | 0.190336 |
MA0061.1 | 0.497495 |
MA0063.1 | 0 |
MA0066.1 | 0.557833 |
MA0067.1 | 1.23721 |
MA0068.1 | 0.133123 |
MA0069.1 | 0.903908 |
MA0070.1 | 0.892666 |
MA0071.1 | 0.518907 |
MA0072.1 | 0.888148 |
MA0073.1 | 2.19892 |
MA0074.1 | 0.552456 |
MA0076.1 | 0.377799 |
MA0077.1 | 0.880402 |
MA0078.1 | 0.652193 |
MA0081.1 | 0.361233 |
MA0083.1 | 0.926258 |
MA0084.1 | 1.42483 |
MA0087.1 | 0.885691 |
MA0088.1 | 0.441522 |
MA0089.1 | 0 |
MA0090.1 | 0.391903 |
MA0091.1 | 0.458301 |
MA0092.1 | 0.421159 |
MA0093.1 | 0.303084 |
MA0095.1 | 0 |
MA0098.1 | 0 |
MA0100.1 | 1.40058 |
MA0101.1 | 0.30624 |
MA0103.1 | 0.291333 |
MA0105.1 | 0.279181 |
MA0106.1 | 0.59853 |
MA0107.1 | 0.236528 |
MA0108.2 | 0.753643 |
MA0109.1 | 0 |
MA0111.1 | 0.405141 |
MA0113.1 | 0.614917 |
MA0114.1 | 0.231781 |
MA0115.1 | 1.1606 |
MA0116.1 | 0.673701 |
MA0117.1 | 0.956472 |
MA0119.1 | 0.913661 |
MA0122.1 | 0.982472 |
MA0124.1 | 1.11898 |
MA0125.1 | 1.0347 |
MA0130.1 | 0 |
MA0131.1 | 0.670358 |
MA0132.1 | 0 |
MA0133.1 | 0 |
MA0135.1 | 0.949204 |
MA0136.1 | 0.564434 |
MA0139.1 | 0.470675 |
MA0140.1 | 0.516266 |
MA0141.1 | 0.944441 |
MA0142.1 | 0.724856 |
MA0143.1 | 0.615094 |
MA0144.1 | 0.218541 |
MA0145.1 | 0.830366 |
MA0146.1 | 0.934908 |
MA0147.1 | 0.243042 |
MA0148.1 | 0.480298 |
MA0149.1 | 0.506665 |
MA0062.2 | 0.161302 |
MA0035.2 | 0.515566 |
MA0039.2 | 0.164269 |
MA0138.2 | 1.57302 |
MA0002.2 | 0.179788 |
MA0137.2 | 0.321796 |
MA0104.2 | 0.189646 |
MA0047.2 | 0.586412 |
MA0112.2 | 1.21228 |
MA0065.2 | 0.490252 |
MA0150.1 | 0.386144 |
MA0151.1 | 0 |
MA0152.1 | 0.52279 |
MA0153.1 | 1.01778 |
MA0154.1 | 0.274121 |
MA0155.1 | 0.764865 |
MA0156.1 | 0.323987 |
MA0157.1 | 0.697424 |
MA0158.1 | 0 |
MA0159.1 | 0.682702 |
MA0160.1 | 0.495355 |
MA0161.1 | 0 |
MA0162.1 | 0.0752715 |
MA0163.1 | 5.66754 |
MA0164.1 | 0.627336 |
MA0080.2 | 0.303167 |
MA0018.2 | 0.599912 |
MA0099.2 | 0.523145 |
MA0079.2 | 0.481761 |
MA0102.2 | 1.46209 |
MA0258.1 | 0.603127 |
MA0259.1 | 0.25092 |
MA0442.1 | 0 |
ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data
No analysis results for this cluster
Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data
This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.