Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1900: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0,

Latest revision as of 11:54, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1900_Mast_cord_immature_CD14_CD34_chronic_CD4



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:25432921..25432925,-p@chr2:25432921..25432925
-
Hg19::chr2:74758077..74758089,-p@chr2:74758077..74758089
-
Hg19::chr7:37393263..37393284,-p11@ELMO1
Hg19::chr7:37393479..37393526,+p@chr7:37393479..37393526
+
Hg19::chr7:642229..642251,-p@chr7:642229..642251
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic cell1.21e-38177
hematopoietic stem cell7.45e-36168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.45e-36168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.42e-33161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.42e-33161
leukocyte4.06e-32136
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.43e-2752
lymphocyte1.08e-2653
common lymphoid progenitor1.08e-2653
nucleate cell1.82e-2555
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.18e-25120
nongranular leukocyte4.32e-20115
T cell8.62e-1625
pro-T cell8.62e-1625
mature alpha-beta T cell2.84e-1318
alpha-beta T cell2.84e-1318
immature T cell2.84e-1318
mature T cell2.84e-1318
immature alpha-beta T cell2.84e-1318
circulating cell2.70e-126
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.32e-116
conventional dendritic cell5.27e-118
myeloid cell1.28e-10108
common myeloid progenitor1.28e-10108
mesenchymal cell4.14e-10354
histamine secreting cell4.81e-105
biogenic amine secreting cell4.81e-105
granulocytopoietic cell4.81e-105
mast cell4.81e-105
mast cell progenitor4.81e-105
basophil mast progenitor cell4.81e-105
Langerhans cell4.92e-105
natural killer cell7.11e-103
pro-NK cell7.11e-103
connective tissue cell1.14e-09361
basophil3.07e-093
naive T cell3.63e-093
dendritic cell7.29e-0910
motile cell3.94e-08386
lymphocyte of B lineage5.64e-0824
pro-B cell5.64e-0824
immature conventional dendritic cell8.04e-085
common dendritic progenitor8.04e-085
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.15e-072
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.15e-072
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.90e-1298
blood island1.90e-1298
hemolymphoid system1.09e-11108
connective tissue4.52e-09371
blood8.69e-0915
haemolymphatic fluid8.69e-0915
organism substance8.69e-0915
immune system8.87e-0793


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.136928
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.0418333
MA0017.10.496101
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.10.195817
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.10.0853006
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.554727
MA0058.11.29981
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.14.22932
MA0061.10.791444
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.692739
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.11.05325
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.12.53033
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.132006
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.11.15584
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.11.00065
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.985964
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.11.8711
MA0114.10.372523
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.10.743749
MA0139.10.277033
MA0140.12.78334
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.10.938075
MA0145.10.868598
MA0146.10.0359558
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.10.653474
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.21.65235
MA0039.20.801354
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.30855
MA0137.20.47779
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.20.136971
MA0065.20.880827
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.98952
MA0155.10.813062
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.12.04894
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.386729
MA0160.11.60707
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.469165
MA0163.10.0439995
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.20.230892
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187935.34388010794140.01187615563868110.043241312883427
EGR1#195843.990543275848110.0067800983001440.0287719591389516
GATA1#2623410.84824651504040.0001390956917094380.00181587686830525



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C1900&oldid=3069017"