Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2508: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0

Latest revision as of 12:07, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2508_mature_skeletal_left_Endothelial_adipose_heart_gastric



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:100111421..100111448,+p5@PALMD
Hg19::chr1:100111479..100111490,+p8@PALMD
Hg19::chr1:100111546..100111567,+p3@PALMD
Hg19::chr1:100111580..100111773,+p1@PALMD


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical cluster1.55e-36373
adult organism2.51e-32114
anatomical conduit3.44e-30240
tube1.17e-29192
epithelium1.36e-20306
multi-tissue structure2.73e-20342
anatomical system3.36e-20624
anatomical group5.15e-20625
cell layer7.36e-20309
organ system subdivision1.65e-18223
multi-cellular organism2.58e-18656
neural tube6.12e-1556
neural rod6.12e-1556
future spinal cord6.12e-1556
neural keel6.12e-1556
vessel1.18e-1468
embryonic structure2.98e-14564
blood vessel endothelium3.78e-1418
endothelium3.78e-1418
cardiovascular system endothelium3.78e-1418
central nervous system4.26e-1481
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.86e-1483
epithelial tube7.71e-14117
germ layer8.29e-14560
germ layer / neural crest8.29e-14560
embryonic tissue8.29e-14560
presumptive structure8.29e-14560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure8.29e-14560
epiblast (generic)8.29e-14560
developing anatomical structure8.83e-14581
regional part of nervous system9.16e-1453
regional part of brain9.16e-1453
neural plate1.82e-1382
presumptive neural plate1.82e-1382
vasculature2.88e-1378
vascular system2.88e-1378
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.95e-13132
embryo3.99e-13592
brain4.27e-1368
future brain4.27e-1368
epithelial tube open at both ends9.73e-1359
blood vessel9.73e-1359
blood vasculature9.73e-1359
vascular cord9.73e-1359
regional part of forebrain2.21e-1241
forebrain2.21e-1241
anterior neural tube2.21e-1241
future forebrain2.21e-1241
simple squamous epithelium2.76e-1222
neurectoderm6.40e-1286
squamous epithelium1.64e-1125
nervous system1.82e-1189
circulatory system3.23e-11112
ecto-epithelium5.12e-11104
cardiovascular system6.67e-10109
brain grey matter9.25e-1034
gray matter9.25e-1034
telencephalon1.35e-0934
organ1.47e-09503
pre-chordal neural plate1.67e-0961
regional part of telencephalon4.65e-0932
primordium4.76e-09160
cerebral hemisphere5.15e-0932
foregut8.84e-0987
organ part1.23e-08218
regional part of cerebral cortex1.29e-0822
endothelial tube1.78e-089
arterial system endothelium1.78e-089
endothelium of artery1.78e-089
subdivision of digestive tract2.68e-08118
ectoderm-derived structure3.12e-08171
ectoderm3.12e-08171
presumptive ectoderm3.12e-08171
neocortex8.43e-0820
primary circulatory organ2.10e-0727
artery4.16e-0742
arterial blood vessel4.16e-0742
arterial system4.16e-0742
unilaminar epithelium7.68e-07148
cerebral cortex8.42e-0725
pallium8.42e-0725


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0214529
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.12.49947
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.11.92746
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.11.73823
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.125954
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.15.62637
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.11.51122
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.14.23774
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.10559
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.12.59564
MA0151.10
MA0152.11.84959
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.253219
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.0626799
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOXA1#3169411.08141974938556.62943068949433e-050.00107111867540238
FOXA2#3170424.63046375266522.71504128667089e-069.43614632075277e-05
GATA3#2625427.2365163572061.81561517799785e-066.77459927027214e-05
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0186100280007012



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.