Coexpression cluster:C4817

Full id: C4817_normal_lung_Endothelial_spleen_Lymphatic_heart_adipose

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:27109392..27109435,+	p1@TEK
Hg19::chr9:27109440..27109456,+	p2@TEK
Hg19::chr9:27109469..27109474,+	p6@TEK

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
endothelial cell of vascular tree	3.78e-18	24
mesodermal cell	2.41e-16	119
endothelial cell	1.11e-14	35
blood vessel endothelial cell	1.22e-13	18
embryonic blood vessel endothelial progenitor cell	1.22e-13	18
vascular associated smooth muscle cell	6.42e-12	32
muscle cell	2.46e-11	54
smooth muscle cell	6.50e-11	42
smooth muscle myoblast	6.50e-11	42
contractile cell	9.80e-11	59
meso-epithelial cell	1.22e-10	44
muscle precursor cell	2.43e-10	57
myoblast	2.43e-10	57
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell	2.43e-10	57
electrically responsive cell	4.48e-10	60
electrically active cell	4.48e-10	60
lining cell	2.34e-08	57
barrier cell	2.34e-08	57
endothelial cell of artery	8.80e-08	9

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm	3.44e-36	84
adult organism	5.37e-34	115
anatomical conduit	2.83e-33	241
tube	3.20e-33	194
vessel	6.66e-33	69
vasculature	7.34e-31	79
vascular system	7.34e-31	79
blood vessel	1.29e-30	60
epithelial tube open at both ends	1.29e-30	60
blood vasculature	1.29e-30	60
vascular cord	1.29e-30	60
circulatory system	2.09e-29	113
anatomical cluster	4.27e-29	286
cardiovascular system	7.52e-28	110
epithelial tube	1.30e-24	118
cell layer	2.29e-24	312
epithelium	4.75e-24	309
artery	1.05e-19	42
arterial blood vessel	1.05e-19	42
arterial system	1.05e-19	42
unilaminar epithelium	7.12e-17	138
systemic artery	1.84e-15	33
systemic arterial system	1.84e-15	33
endothelium	1.22e-13	18
blood vessel endothelium	1.22e-13	18
cardiovascular system endothelium	1.22e-13	18
muscle tissue	1.04e-12	63
musculature	1.04e-12	63
musculature of body	1.04e-12	63
neural tube	1.14e-12	57
neural rod	1.14e-12	57
future spinal cord	1.14e-12	57
neural keel	1.14e-12	57
regional part of brain	3.16e-12	59
multi-cellular organism	3.60e-12	659
primary circulatory organ	4.50e-12	27
skeletal muscle tissue	5.45e-12	61
striated muscle tissue	5.45e-12	61
myotome	5.45e-12	61
anatomical group	7.06e-12	626
anterior neural tube	7.98e-12	42
anatomical system	8.29e-12	625
neural plate	1.16e-11	86
presumptive neural plate	1.16e-11	86
regional part of forebrain	3.04e-11	41
forebrain	3.04e-11	41
future forebrain	3.04e-11	41
multi-tissue structure	3.21e-11	347
simple squamous epithelium	6.74e-11	22
heart	1.44e-10	24
primitive heart tube	1.44e-10	24
primary heart field	1.44e-10	24
anterior lateral plate mesoderm	1.44e-10	24
heart tube	1.44e-10	24
heart primordium	1.44e-10	24
cardiac mesoderm	1.44e-10	24
cardiogenic plate	1.44e-10	24
heart rudiment	1.44e-10	24
aorta	1.88e-10	21
aortic system	1.88e-10	21
neurectoderm	3.66e-10	90
organism subdivision	4.78e-10	365
squamous epithelium	5.59e-10	25
dermomyotome	7.91e-10	70
central nervous system	8.56e-10	82
brain	1.00e-09	69
future brain	1.00e-09	69
gray matter	4.42e-09	34
brain grey matter	4.42e-09	34
telencephalon	5.27e-09	34
regional part of telencephalon	9.31e-09	33
cerebral hemisphere	2.17e-08	32
pre-chordal neural plate	6.45e-08	61
regional part of nervous system	8.28e-08	94
nervous system	8.28e-08	94
endothelial tube	8.80e-08	9
arterial system endothelium	8.80e-08	9
endothelium of artery	8.80e-08	9
compound organ	2.06e-07	69
regional part of cerebral cortex	2.37e-07	22

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.