Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C733: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C733_pineal_neuroectodermal_anaplastic_epithelioid_papillary_parietal_middle |id=C733 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
|full_id=C733_pineal_neuroectodermal_anaplastic_epithelioid_papillary_parietal_middle
|full_id=C733_pineal_neuroectodermal_anaplastic_epithelioid_papillary_parietal_middle
|id=C733
|id=C733
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0002620!6.98e-07!23
|ontology_enrichment_disease=
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=UBERON:0001049!3.94e-34!57;UBERON:0005068!3.94e-34!57;UBERON:0006241!3.94e-34!57;UBERON:0007135!3.94e-34!57;UBERON:0001017!2.24e-31!82;UBERON:0000955!2.00e-30!69;UBERON:0006238!2.00e-30!69;UBERON:0005743!1.11e-29!86;UBERON:0000073!7.89e-29!94;UBERON:0001016!7.89e-29!94;UBERON:0002780!9.38e-29!41;UBERON:0001890!9.38e-29!41;UBERON:0006240!9.38e-29!41;UBERON:0002616!2.11e-28!59;UBERON:0003080!1.17e-27!42;UBERON:0002346!1.83e-27!90;UBERON:0002020!8.52e-27!34;UBERON:0003528!8.52e-27!34;UBERON:0001893!1.07e-26!34;UBERON:0003075!3.89e-26!86;UBERON:0007284!3.89e-26!86;UBERON:0002791!6.23e-26!33;UBERON:0001869!5.67e-25!32;UBERON:0003056!5.54e-20!61;UBERON:0000956!6.31e-19!25;UBERON:0000203!6.31e-19!25;UBERON:0002619!3.10e-18!22;UBERON:0007023!5.11e-17!115;UBERON:0000924!1.30e-16!173;UBERON:0006601!1.30e-16!173;UBERON:0000033!1.51e-16!123;UBERON:0001950!1.95e-16!20;UBERON:0000153!8.68e-16!129;UBERON:0007811!8.68e-16!129;UBERON:0004121!1.58e-15!169;UBERON:0002420!1.63e-09!9;UBERON:0007245!1.63e-09!9;UBERON:0010009!1.63e-09!9;UBERON:0010011!1.63e-09!9;UBERON:0000454!1.63e-09!9;UBERON:0002308!2.23e-09!9;UBERON:0000125!2.23e-09!9;UBERON:0000025!7.57e-08!194;UBERON:0003076!1.01e-07!15;UBERON:0003057!1.01e-07!15;UBERON:0009663!1.04e-07!7;UBERON:0000475!1.14e-07!365
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:57, 21 May 2012


Full id: C733_pineal_neuroectodermal_anaplastic_epithelioid_papillary_parietal_middle



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:126565298..126565302,-p@chr11:126565298..126565302
-
Hg19::chr11:126605112..126605121,-p@chr11:126605112..126605121
-
Hg19::chr11:126669389..126669406,-p@chr11:126669389..126669406
-
Hg19::chr11:126724227..126724237,-p@chr11:126724227..126724237
-
Hg19::chr11:126792092..126792107,-p@chr11:126792092..126792107
-
Hg19::chr11:126792108..126792125,-p@chr11:126792108..126792125
-
Hg19::chr11:126794867..126794870,-p@chr11:126794867..126794870
-
Hg19::chr11:126794895..126794906,-p@chr11:126794895..126794906
-
Hg19::chr11:126798945..126798948,-p@chr11:126798945..126798948
-
Hg19::chr11:126824157..126824162,-p@chr11:126824157..126824162
-
Hg19::chr11:126842992..126842996,-p@chr11:126842992..126842996
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
skin fibroblast6.98e-0723
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube3.94e-3457
neural rod3.94e-3457
future spinal cord3.94e-3457
neural keel3.94e-3457
central nervous system2.24e-3182
brain2.00e-3069
future brain2.00e-3069
regional part of nervous system7.89e-2994
nervous system7.89e-2994
regional part of forebrain9.38e-2941
forebrain9.38e-2941
future forebrain9.38e-2941
regional part of brain2.11e-2859
anterior neural tube1.17e-2742
neurectoderm1.83e-2790
gray matter8.52e-2734
brain grey matter8.52e-2734
telencephalon1.07e-2634
neural plate3.89e-2686
presumptive neural plate3.89e-2686
regional part of telencephalon6.23e-2633
cerebral hemisphere5.67e-2532
pre-chordal neural plate5.54e-2061
cerebral cortex6.31e-1925
pallium6.31e-1925
regional part of cerebral cortex3.10e-1822
adult organism5.11e-17115
ectoderm1.30e-16173
presumptive ectoderm1.30e-16173
head1.51e-16123
neocortex1.95e-1620
anterior region of body8.68e-16129
craniocervical region8.68e-16129
ectoderm-derived structure1.58e-15169
basal ganglion1.63e-099
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.63e-099
aggregate regional part of brain1.63e-099
collection of basal ganglia1.63e-099
cerebral subcortex1.63e-099
nucleus of brain2.23e-099
neural nucleus2.23e-099
tube7.57e-08194
posterior neural tube1.01e-0715
chordal neural plate1.01e-0715
telencephalic nucleus1.04e-077
organism subdivision1.14e-07365


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.