Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1303

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:08, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1303_hippocampus_pituitary_insula_medulla_medial_occipital_paracentral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:125425217..125425232,+p@chr10:125425217..125425232
+
Hg19::chr11:81359062..81359117,-p@chr11:81359062..81359117
-
Hg19::chr11:81359124..81359143,-p@chr11:81359124..81359143
-
Hg19::chr11:81359178..81359208,-p@chr11:81359178..81359208
-
Hg19::chr6:152793728..152793766,-p14@SYNE1
Hg19::chrX:151619719..151619724,-p3@GABRA3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0045211postsynaptic membrane0.000948648538551125
GO:0044456synapse part0.000948648538551125
GO:0005521lamin binding0.00875643846671322
GO:0008503benzodiazepine receptor activity0.00875643846671322
GO:0007030Golgi organization and biogenesis0.014008857951139
GO:0007214gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathway0.0216765454530563
GO:0006997nuclear organization and biogenesis0.0235034451487031
GO:0004890GABA-A receptor activity0.0235034451487031
GO:0042692muscle cell differentiation0.0235034451487031
GO:0016917GABA receptor activity0.0235034451487031
GO:0043168anion binding0.0249988776174169
GO:0031404chloride ion binding0.0249988776174169
GO:0005254chloride channel activity0.0310576757163792
GO:0006821chloride transport0.0310576757163792
GO:0005253anion channel activity0.0333121960667309
GO:0005230extracellular ligand-gated ion channel activity0.0389860458602887
GO:0030594neurotransmitter receptor activity0.0389860458602887
GO:0042165neurotransmitter binding0.0389860458602887
GO:0031965nuclear membrane0.0389860458602887
GO:0015276ligand-gated ion channel activity0.0389860458602887
GO:0022834ligand-gated channel activity0.0389860458602887
GO:0005635nuclear envelope0.0440018987458718
GO:0008509anion transmembrane transporter activity0.0453330200615595



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system1.42e-5694
nervous system1.42e-5694
central nervous system2.90e-5482
neural tube1.93e-5157
neural rod1.93e-5157
future spinal cord1.93e-5157
neural keel1.93e-5157
regional part of brain2.76e-4859
brain1.29e-4569
future brain1.29e-4569
regional part of forebrain6.50e-4341
forebrain6.50e-4341
future forebrain6.50e-4341
anterior neural tube1.53e-4142
neurectoderm4.10e-4090
neural plate1.13e-3886
presumptive neural plate1.13e-3886
telencephalon2.39e-3534
gray matter2.47e-3534
brain grey matter2.47e-3534
regional part of telencephalon5.26e-3433
cerebral hemisphere2.86e-3332
adult organism3.90e-33115
pre-chordal neural plate3.51e-3161
ectoderm6.45e-31173
presumptive ectoderm6.45e-31173
ectoderm-derived structure1.77e-29169
head8.44e-29123
regional part of cerebral cortex2.34e-2722
anterior region of body2.02e-26129
craniocervical region2.02e-26129
cerebral cortex5.95e-2525
pallium5.95e-2525
neocortex1.01e-2420
tube1.94e-12194
basal ganglion7.30e-129
nuclear complex of neuraxis7.30e-129
aggregate regional part of brain7.30e-129
collection of basal ganglia7.30e-129
cerebral subcortex7.30e-129
nucleus of brain8.08e-129
neural nucleus8.08e-129
posterior neural tube6.12e-1115
chordal neural plate6.12e-1115
telencephalic nucleus1.87e-097
gyrus2.37e-096
organism subdivision4.05e-09365
diencephalon7.38e-097
future diencephalon7.38e-097
segmental subdivision of nervous system8.10e-0913
temporal lobe1.34e-087
brainstem3.52e-088
anatomical conduit3.89e-08241
limbic system6.41e-085
segmental subdivision of hindbrain6.50e-0812
hindbrain6.50e-0812
presumptive hindbrain6.50e-0812
parietal lobe7.13e-085
occipital lobe1.14e-075
anatomical cluster1.45e-07286


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.