Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1083

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 10:48, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1083_lung_uterus_Endothelial_neuroectodermal_spleen_mesenchymal_occipital



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:16900023..16900034,-p7@LDB2
Hg19::chr4:16900184..16900195,-p6@LDB2
Hg19::chr4:16900198..16900214,-p2@LDB2
Hg19::chr4:16900219..16900230,-p5@LDB2
Hg19::chr4:16900242..16900317,-p1@LDB2
Hg19::chr4:16900320..16900332,-p8@LDB2
Hg19::chr4:16900395..16900407,-p3@LDB2
Hg19::chr4:16900410..16900427,-p4@LDB2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism6.45e-31114
regional part of forebrain1.54e-2141
forebrain1.54e-2141
anterior neural tube1.54e-2141
future forebrain1.54e-2141
central nervous system2.07e-2081
cerebral hemisphere4.40e-2032
telencephalon5.46e-2034
neural tube1.12e-1956
neural rod1.12e-1956
future spinal cord1.12e-1956
neural keel1.12e-1956
brain grey matter2.69e-1934
gray matter2.69e-1934
regional part of telencephalon3.28e-1932
nervous system1.04e-1889
regional part of nervous system1.08e-1853
regional part of brain1.08e-1853
neurectoderm4.29e-1786
anatomical cluster5.92e-17373
brain6.08e-1768
future brain6.08e-1768
cerebral cortex1.08e-1625
pallium1.08e-1625
regional part of cerebral cortex1.62e-1622
neocortex1.17e-1520
neural plate7.09e-1582
presumptive neural plate7.09e-1582
anatomical conduit8.37e-15240
pre-chordal neural plate4.24e-1361
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.23e-13132
tube7.56e-13192
ectoderm-derived structure3.99e-11171
ectoderm3.99e-11171
presumptive ectoderm3.99e-11171
organ system subdivision1.03e-10223
multi-cellular organism1.83e-10656
blood vessel endothelium1.09e-0918
endothelium1.09e-0918
cardiovascular system endothelium1.09e-0918
cell layer7.31e-09309
epithelium1.02e-08306
ecto-epithelium4.42e-08104
anatomical system1.19e-07624
simple squamous epithelium1.33e-0722
squamous epithelium1.54e-0725
anatomical group1.63e-07625
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.72e-0783
vessel5.73e-0768


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SIN3A#2594285.408884726815141.36410592556506e-065.35384662758697e-05
TAF1#687283.343046285745296.40776711117462e-050.0010437005447972
USF1#739164.771124457905970.0003163361106003810.00324059117753735



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.