Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2843

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:01, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr13:43218194..43218199,+p27@Phactr1
Mm9::chr13:43218218..43218238,+p7@Phactr1
Mm9::chr4:86221700..86221711,+p6@Rraga


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0042268regulation of cytolysis0.00942285039103686
GO:0004864protein phosphatase inhibitor activity0.0270751097280139
GO:0019212phosphatase inhibitor activity0.0270751097280139
GO:0019835cytolysis0.0270751097280139
GO:0019888protein phosphatase regulator activity0.0274584677552507
GO:0019208phosphatase regulator activity0.0274584677552507



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
autonomic neuron6.25e-109

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
autonomic nervous system6.25e-109
peripheral nervous system1.37e-0911
urinary system structure1.93e-0818
renal system9.25e-0819
ectodermal placode6.40e-0713
kidney6.46e-0714
kidney mesenchyme6.46e-0714
upper urinary tract6.46e-0714
kidney rudiment6.46e-0714
kidney field6.46e-0714


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}