Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1266

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:47, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1266_aorta_retina_eye_neuroectodermal_tongue_trachea_spleen



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:183730840..183730851,-p7@FRZB
Hg19::chr2:183731087..183731115,+p@chr2:183731087..183731115
+
Hg19::chr2:183731285..183731309,-p2@FRZB
Hg19::chr2:183731311..183731323,-p5@FRZB
Hg19::chr2:183731332..183731352,-p4@FRZB
Hg19::chr2:183731355..183731384,-p3@FRZB
Hg19::chr2:183731495..183731507,-p6@FRZB


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism4.38e-59114
neurectoderm2.09e-3886
neural plate3.45e-3582
presumptive neural plate3.45e-3582
neural tube2.24e-3356
neural rod2.24e-3356
future spinal cord2.24e-3356
neural keel2.24e-3356
regional part of nervous system6.88e-3153
regional part of brain6.88e-3153
nervous system1.51e-3089
central nervous system4.85e-2981
brain3.74e-2668
future brain3.74e-2668
ectoderm-derived structure1.43e-25171
ectoderm1.43e-25171
presumptive ectoderm1.43e-25171
ecto-epithelium1.40e-24104
regional part of forebrain2.84e-2441
forebrain2.84e-2441
anterior neural tube2.84e-2441
future forebrain2.84e-2441
organ system subdivision6.31e-24223
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest7.59e-24132
pre-chordal neural plate8.47e-2461
telencephalon7.37e-1934
cerebral hemisphere8.11e-1832
brain grey matter1.54e-1734
gray matter1.54e-1734
regional part of telencephalon1.59e-1732
anatomical cluster2.42e-16373
multi-tissue structure6.20e-15342
cerebral cortex1.00e-1425
pallium1.00e-1425
regional part of cerebral cortex1.95e-1422
neocortex2.84e-1320
posterior neural tube3.79e-1015
chordal neural plate3.79e-1015
embryo4.75e-10592
organ part5.59e-10218
multi-cellular organism1.08e-09656
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.13e-0813
embryonic structure2.06e-08564
germ layer2.58e-08560
germ layer / neural crest2.58e-08560
embryonic tissue2.58e-08560
presumptive structure2.58e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure2.58e-08560
epiblast (generic)2.58e-08560
developing anatomical structure7.89e-08581
segmental subdivision of hindbrain8.41e-0812
hindbrain8.41e-0812
presumptive hindbrain8.41e-0812
gastrointestinal system3.80e-0725
intestine4.40e-0717
diencephalon4.99e-077
future diencephalon4.99e-077


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
GATA2#262459.103522666824285.45256227113712e-050.000924148249002418



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.