Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2775

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:28, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2775_gastric_chronic_neuroepithelioma_neuroectodermal_gall_Fibroblast_adenocarcinoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:127828532..127828536,-p@chr4:127828532..127828536
-
Hg19::chr4:127876558..127876592,-p1@ENST00000515428
Hg19::chr4:127876971..127876985,-p3@ENST00000515428
Hg19::chr4:127877092..127877113,-p@chr4:127877092..127877113
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
skin fibroblast2.21e-1423
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
skin of body5.04e-1340
regional part of brain4.93e-1259
telencephalon8.13e-1234
cerebral hemisphere2.00e-1132
integument6.65e-1145
integumental system6.65e-1145
regional part of telencephalon7.08e-1133
brain7.58e-1169
future brain7.58e-1169
neural tube1.95e-1057
neural rod1.95e-1057
future spinal cord1.95e-1057
neural keel1.95e-1057
central nervous system2.29e-1082
gray matter2.40e-1034
brain grey matter2.40e-1034
cerebral cortex3.13e-0925
pallium3.13e-0925
regional part of forebrain5.49e-0941
forebrain5.49e-0941
future forebrain5.49e-0941
regional part of nervous system1.02e-0894
nervous system1.02e-0894
anterior neural tube1.16e-0842
neurectoderm1.11e-0790
neocortex1.87e-0720
dermis3.59e-079
dermatome3.59e-079
future dermis3.59e-079
neural plate6.62e-0786
presumptive neural plate6.62e-0786
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
chronic leukemia1.51e-108
musculoskeletal system disease2.19e-095
myotonic disease2.19e-095
muscle tissue disease2.19e-095
myopathy2.19e-095
muscular disease2.19e-095
myotonic dystrophy2.19e-095


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.