Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4722

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:52, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4722_osteosarcoma_Neutrophils_aorta_Melanocyte_melanoma_Eosinophils_medial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:120428600..120428642,+p2@NOV
Hg19::chr8:120428643..120428661,+p3@NOV
Hg19::chr8:120428709..120428716,+p4@NOV


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism8.31e-21115
central nervous system8.87e-1382
regional part of nervous system2.03e-1294
nervous system2.03e-1294
neural tube3.03e-1157
neural rod3.03e-1157
future spinal cord3.03e-1157
neural keel3.03e-1157
cerebral hemisphere4.71e-1132
telencephalon8.82e-1134
anterior neural tube9.98e-1142
regional part of cerebral cortex1.01e-1022
neural plate1.20e-1086
presumptive neural plate1.20e-1086
regional part of forebrain1.75e-1041
forebrain1.75e-1041
future forebrain1.75e-1041
organ1.86e-10511
brain2.24e-1069
future brain2.24e-1069
regional part of telencephalon3.05e-1033
cerebral cortex3.43e-1025
pallium3.43e-1025
pre-chordal neural plate5.82e-1061
gray matter6.23e-1034
brain grey matter6.23e-1034
neurectoderm6.56e-1090
neocortex6.66e-1020
regional part of brain3.86e-0959
anatomical system5.82e-09625
anatomical group9.17e-09626
head2.26e-08123
multi-cellular organism6.25e-08659
anterior region of body6.85e-08129
craniocervical region6.85e-08129
ectoderm-derived structure2.13e-07169
larynx2.18e-079
ectoderm4.66e-07173
presumptive ectoderm4.66e-07173
organ part9.38e-07219
germ layer9.55e-07604
embryonic tissue9.55e-07604
presumptive structure9.55e-07604
epiblast (generic)9.55e-07604


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.