Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4415

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:00, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4415_caudate_putamen_cord_Natural_CD8_nucleus_Basophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:42658957..42658974,-p5@ATP8A1
Hg19::chr4:42658982..42659008,-p3@ATP8A1
Hg19::chr4:42659011..42659029,-p4@ATP8A1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.11e-43115
neural tube1.08e-2357
neural rod1.08e-2357
future spinal cord1.08e-2357
neural keel1.08e-2357
anterior neural tube2.48e-2342
regional part of forebrain5.80e-2341
forebrain5.80e-2341
future forebrain5.80e-2341
central nervous system2.30e-2082
telencephalon1.80e-1934
regional part of brain4.83e-1959
gray matter6.72e-1934
brain grey matter6.72e-1934
regional part of telencephalon8.33e-1933
brain8.51e-1969
future brain8.51e-1969
cerebral hemisphere1.47e-1832
regional part of nervous system4.08e-1894
nervous system4.08e-1894
neural plate2.11e-1786
presumptive neural plate2.11e-1786
pre-chordal neural plate1.20e-1561
regional part of cerebral cortex2.92e-1522
neurectoderm3.04e-1590
neocortex5.46e-1420
cerebral cortex1.04e-1325
pallium1.04e-1325
anterior region of body1.33e-08129
craniocervical region1.33e-08129
blood2.58e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid2.58e-0815
organism substance2.58e-0815
basal ganglion1.39e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.39e-079
aggregate regional part of brain1.39e-079
collection of basal ganglia1.39e-079
cerebral subcortex1.39e-079
head5.41e-07123


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.