Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1681

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:16, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:76073809..76073826,-p2@Parp10
Mm9::chr1:23929091..23929120,-p2@Smap1
Mm9::chr2:62484203..62484291,-p1@Ifih1
Mm9::chr6:39068181..39068206,-p3@Parp12
Mm9::chr6:39068210..39068251,-p1@Parp12


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0045648positive regulation of erythrocyte differentiation0.0400355737334601
GO:0045646regulation of erythrocyte differentiation0.0400355737334601
GO:0003950NAD+ ADP-ribosyltransferase activity0.0400355737334601
GO:0045639positive regulation of myeloid cell differentiation0.0400355737334601



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure3.02e-16118
endoderm3.02e-16118
presumptive endoderm3.02e-16118
digestive system1.16e-15116
digestive tract1.16e-15116
primitive gut1.16e-15116
subdivision of digestive tract8.62e-15114
intestine9.90e-1131
gastrointestinal system2.05e-1047
organ component layer3.99e-0924
mucosa1.53e-0715
endo-epithelium2.51e-0769
unilaminar epithelium3.26e-0766


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}