Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1789

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:15, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1789_Small_MCF7_occipital_temporal_parietal_duodenum_brain



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:61043561..61043617,+p@chr17:61043561..61043617
+
Hg19::chr17:61043618..61043648,+p@chr17:61043618..61043648
+
Hg19::chr17:61043653..61043672,+p@chr17:61043653..61043672
+
Hg19::chr17:61043790..61043869,+p@chr17:61043790..61043869
+
Hg19::chr17:61043870..61043902,+p@chr17:61043870..61043902
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
respiratory epithelial cell4.02e-0813
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube8.12e-2357
neural rod8.12e-2357
future spinal cord8.12e-2357
neural keel8.12e-2357
central nervous system4.80e-2182
brain1.22e-2069
future brain1.22e-2069
regional part of brain1.27e-2059
regional part of forebrain4.85e-1941
forebrain4.85e-1941
future forebrain4.85e-1941
anterior neural tube9.57e-1942
ectoderm-derived structure2.01e-18169
telencephalon2.10e-1834
regional part of nervous system3.02e-1894
nervous system3.02e-1894
gray matter4.08e-1834
brain grey matter4.08e-1834
regional part of telencephalon8.60e-1833
anatomical system8.87e-18625
organism subdivision9.30e-18365
cerebral hemisphere1.05e-1732
anatomical group2.41e-17626
multi-cellular organism6.23e-17659
ectoderm1.17e-16173
presumptive ectoderm1.17e-16173
head3.69e-16123
anterior region of body5.76e-15129
craniocervical region5.76e-15129
organ1.82e-14511
cerebral cortex8.83e-1425
pallium8.83e-1425
regional part of cerebral cortex2.29e-1322
neural plate4.63e-1386
presumptive neural plate4.63e-1386
neocortex1.17e-1220
embryonic structure1.72e-11605
developing anatomical structure1.72e-11605
germ layer2.84e-11604
embryonic tissue2.84e-11604
presumptive structure2.84e-11604
epiblast (generic)2.84e-11604
pre-chordal neural plate3.66e-1161
neurectoderm4.77e-1190
embryo6.81e-11612
organ part1.76e-09219
epithelium7.03e-08309
cell layer1.41e-07312
anatomical conduit5.61e-07241
tube7.75e-07194


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.