Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3409

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:36, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3409_CD8_CD4_thymus_Whole_Basophils_Natural_Peripheral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:22392117..22392123,+p3@ENST00000390440
p3@uc010aiz.2
Hg19::chr14:22564289..22564290,+p3@uc010tmp.1
Hg19::chr7:38340032..38340037,-p3@TRGV10


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
mature alpha-beta T cell1.01e-3918
alpha-beta T cell1.01e-3918
immature T cell1.01e-3918
mature T cell1.01e-3918
immature alpha-beta T cell1.01e-3918
T cell5.69e-3025
pro-T cell5.69e-3025
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.11e-2611
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.72e-1852
lymphocyte1.95e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor1.95e-1753
nongranular leukocyte1.22e-14119
leukocyte8.95e-14140
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell2.52e-136
hematopoietic stem cell7.23e-11172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.23e-11172
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell9.92e-11124
hematopoietic cell1.02e-09182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.39e-09165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.39e-09165
natural killer cell9.28e-083
pro-NK cell9.28e-083
mononuclear cell9.49e-083
naive T cell1.75e-073
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
blood3.82e-1415
haemolymphatic fluid3.82e-1415
organism substance3.82e-1415
hemopoietic organ2.54e-117
thymus7.10e-104
hemolymphoid system gland7.10e-104
thymic region7.10e-104
pharyngeal gland7.10e-104
thymus primordium7.10e-104
hemolymphoid system6.44e-08112
adult organism8.79e-08115
hematopoietic system1.07e-07102
blood island1.07e-07102
chordate pharynx1.17e-0710
pharyngeal region of foregut1.17e-0710
pharynx6.86e-0711


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.