Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4092

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:44, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4092_occipital_duodenum_temporal_parietal_Fibroblast_Neural_Multipotent



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr22:28197497..28197544,-p2@MN1
Hg19::chr22:28197702..28197758,-p1@MN1
Hg19::chr22:28197990..28198018,-p@chr22:28197990..28198018
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.22e-1145
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.18e-1142
fibroblast1.78e-0875
non-terminally differentiated cell3.64e-07180
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-cellular organism8.50e-21659
anatomical system1.33e-16625
anatomical group2.89e-16626
embryo6.13e-16612
head3.02e-14123
embryonic structure3.11e-14605
developing anatomical structure3.11e-14605
germ layer4.12e-14604
embryonic tissue4.12e-14604
presumptive structure4.12e-14604
epiblast (generic)4.12e-14604
organ4.68e-14511
ectoderm8.82e-14173
presumptive ectoderm8.82e-14173
ectoderm-derived structure2.08e-13169
anterior region of body2.23e-13129
craniocervical region2.23e-13129
neurectoderm4.27e-1190
neural plate8.72e-1186
presumptive neural plate8.72e-1186
organism subdivision1.30e-10365
central nervous system1.05e-0982
regional part of brain9.80e-0959
regional part of nervous system1.61e-0894
nervous system1.61e-0894
pre-chordal neural plate2.75e-0861
anatomical cluster6.68e-08286
brain8.40e-0869
future brain8.40e-0869
neural tube1.54e-0757
neural rod1.54e-0757
future spinal cord1.54e-0757
neural keel1.54e-0757
subdivision of head3.66e-0748


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.