Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4782

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:52, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4782_small_gastrointestinal_medulloblastoma_Hodgkin_hepatoblastoma_anaplastic_acute



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:95907993..95908004,+p6@C8orf38
Hg19::chr8:95908020..95908035,+p3@C8orf38
Hg19::chr8:95908044..95908055,+p4@C8orf38


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphocyte8.89e-1153
common lymphoid progenitor8.89e-1153
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.06e-1052
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube1.60e-0857
neural rod1.60e-0857
future spinal cord1.60e-0857
neural keel1.60e-0857
adult organism1.35e-07115
regional part of nervous system1.47e-0794
nervous system1.47e-0794
brain1.68e-0769
future brain1.68e-0769
central nervous system4.28e-0782
gray matter4.93e-0734
brain grey matter4.93e-0734
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer1.18e-38235
disease of cellular proliferation9.39e-37239
cell type cancer1.01e-25143
carcinoma1.54e-20106
organ system cancer1.07e-17137
hematologic cancer1.21e-1551
immune system cancer1.21e-1551
leukemia2.00e-1439
myeloid leukemia6.82e-1231


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.