Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2545

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:17, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2545_skeletal_Mast_Mesenchymal_stomach_lung_left_rectum



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:184356112..184356185,+p1@C1orf21
Hg19::chr1:184356188..184356200,+p3@C1orf21
Hg19::chr1:184356231..184356262,+p2@C1orf21
Hg19::chr1:184356271..184356286,+p4@C1orf21


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.58e-30115
neural tube2.55e-2057
neural rod2.55e-2057
future spinal cord2.55e-2057
neural keel2.55e-2057
ectoderm-derived structure3.06e-18169
ectoderm1.41e-17173
presumptive ectoderm1.41e-17173
regional part of brain2.50e-1759
anterior neural tube1.33e-1642
neural plate3.01e-1686
presumptive neural plate3.01e-1686
regional part of forebrain5.69e-1641
forebrain5.69e-1641
future forebrain5.69e-1641
central nervous system9.50e-1682
neurectoderm3.22e-1590
gray matter3.58e-1534
brain grey matter3.58e-1534
head3.61e-15123
brain3.73e-1569
future brain3.73e-1569
telencephalon5.21e-1534
regional part of nervous system6.48e-1594
nervous system6.48e-1594
anterior region of body8.21e-15129
craniocervical region8.21e-15129
cerebral hemisphere8.54e-1532
regional part of telencephalon1.51e-1433
regional part of cerebral cortex5.20e-1322
cerebral cortex1.54e-1225
pallium1.54e-1225
pre-chordal neural plate3.36e-1261
organism subdivision5.39e-12365
neocortex6.70e-1220
multi-cellular organism1.23e-09659
anatomical conduit1.47e-09241
anatomical cluster1.11e-08286
epithelium3.17e-08309
anatomical group3.82e-08626
anatomical system5.80e-08625
cell layer5.97e-08312
multi-tissue structure6.64e-08347
organ part2.35e-07219


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90546.336201576962630.0006203100587215640.00512373949879955
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.0106516310329217
EGR1#195844.988179094810140.001615011500076050.0101480167292247
MYC#460945.22228187160940.001344309395272740.00887978805470175
RAD21#5885410.35503389545638.6948481184721e-050.0012944850215896
ZBTB7A#5134147.35190930787590.000342223540015990.00346735392857295
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.00248991040937241



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.