Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3369

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:16, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3369_peripheral_thyroid_medulloblastoma_argyrophil_neuroblastoma_Adipocyte_neuroectodermal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:37494248..37494260,-p3@SMAD9
Hg19::chr13:37494275..37494304,-p2@SMAD9
Hg19::chr13:37494306..37494324,-p4@SMAD9


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
non-terminally differentiated cell7.72e-08180
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism5.51e-26115
regional part of nervous system4.22e-2494
nervous system4.22e-2494
neurectoderm4.92e-2290
central nervous system6.12e-2082
neural tube6.35e-2057
neural rod6.35e-2057
future spinal cord6.35e-2057
neural keel6.35e-2057
neural plate1.28e-1986
presumptive neural plate1.28e-1986
organism subdivision6.79e-18365
brain2.36e-1769
future brain2.36e-1769
regional part of brain3.22e-1559
ectoderm4.43e-15173
presumptive ectoderm4.43e-15173
regional part of forebrain6.59e-1441
forebrain6.59e-1441
future forebrain6.59e-1441
epithelium7.48e-14309
anterior neural tube8.73e-1442
cell layer1.13e-13312
ectoderm-derived structure2.40e-13169
anatomical conduit3.11e-13241
pre-chordal neural plate3.35e-1361
multi-cellular organism3.53e-13659
multi-tissue structure5.78e-13347
tube7.75e-13194
anatomical cluster8.08e-13286
head1.60e-12123
anterior region of body2.81e-12129
craniocervical region2.81e-12129
gray matter2.90e-1134
brain grey matter2.90e-1134
telencephalon2.94e-1134
regional part of telencephalon6.32e-1133
cerebral hemisphere4.01e-1032
cerebral cortex4.84e-0925
pallium4.84e-0925
regional part of cerebral cortex9.48e-0922
anatomical system1.35e-08625
anatomical group2.04e-08626
embryo4.00e-08612
neocortex6.98e-0820
embryonic structure9.81e-08605
developing anatomical structure9.81e-08605
germ layer1.65e-07604
embryonic tissue1.65e-07604
presumptive structure1.65e-07604
epiblast (generic)1.65e-07604
posterior neural tube1.65e-0715
chordal neural plate1.65e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
neuroectodermal tumor7.83e-0710


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321120138485501
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0319636667900087
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167114893827268
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0293687628071353
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0189811105420284



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.