Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3799

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:46, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3799_gastrointestinal_H9_testicular_iPS_ductus_seminal_Renal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:42827784..42827798,+p@chr19:42827784..42827798
+
Hg19::chr19:42827826..42827836,+p@chr19:42827826..42827836
+
Hg19::chr19:42827876..42827888,+p@chr19:42827876..42827888
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system2.62e-1682
neural tube1.12e-1557
neural rod1.12e-1557
future spinal cord1.12e-1557
neural keel1.12e-1557
regional part of nervous system1.47e-1594
nervous system1.47e-1594
adult organism5.52e-13115
neural plate6.61e-1386
presumptive neural plate6.61e-1386
neurectoderm7.70e-1390
regional part of brain2.71e-1259
intraembryonic coelom2.38e-1021
brain3.83e-1069
future brain3.83e-1069
renal tubule5.91e-1012
nephron tubule5.91e-1012
nephron tubule epithelium5.91e-1012
ectoderm1.24e-09173
presumptive ectoderm1.24e-09173
ectoderm-derived structure1.58e-09169
regional part of forebrain2.55e-0941
forebrain2.55e-0941
future forebrain2.55e-0941
mesonephros3.32e-0918
pronephros3.32e-0918
nephrogenic cord3.32e-0918
pronephric mesoderm3.32e-0918
rostral part of nephrogenic cord3.32e-0918
presumptive pronephric mesoderm3.32e-0918
anterior neural tube5.50e-0942
posterior neural tube6.77e-0915
chordal neural plate6.77e-0915
nephron epithelium1.40e-0816
nephron1.40e-0816
uriniferous tubule1.40e-0816
metanephric mesenchyme1.40e-0816
nephrogenic mesenchyme1.40e-0816
duct3.69e-0826
gray matter4.84e-0834
brain grey matter4.84e-0834
urogenital ridge5.12e-0820
testis6.04e-088
excretory tube6.13e-0817
mesonephric epithelium6.13e-0817
mesonephric tubule6.13e-0817
nephric duct6.13e-0817
kidney epithelium6.13e-0817
renal duct6.13e-0817
mesonephric duct6.13e-0817
pronephric duct6.13e-0817
male reproductive organ1.57e-0711
organ part2.09e-07219
regional part of telencephalon3.35e-0733
cortex of kidney4.42e-0713
renal parenchyma4.42e-0713
cavitated compound organ4.58e-0732
pre-chordal neural plate5.04e-0761
telencephalon6.83e-0734
tube8.39e-07194
cortex9.08e-0716


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0186486739079282
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190256232537727
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00421582476421292



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.