Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2948

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:36, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2948_rhabdomyosarcoma_rectum_Saos2_teratocarcinoma_cerebellum_mesothelioma_gastrointestinal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:98258815..98258820,-p@chr9:98258815..98258820
-
Hg19::chr9:98271426..98271454,-p3@PTCH1
Hg19::chr9:98271460..98271496,-p@chr9:98271460..98271496
-
Hg19::chr9:98271524..98271555,-p@chr9:98271524..98271555
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system1.07e-2689
central nervous system1.75e-2581
adult organism9.96e-25114
organ system subdivision4.91e-24223
neural tube1.84e-2156
neural rod1.84e-2156
future spinal cord1.84e-2156
neural keel1.84e-2156
brain5.17e-2068
future brain5.17e-2068
regional part of nervous system7.32e-2053
regional part of brain7.32e-2053
neurectoderm8.13e-1886
neural plate2.04e-1682
presumptive neural plate2.04e-1682
brain grey matter5.20e-1634
gray matter5.20e-1634
telencephalon1.04e-1534
regional part of forebrain1.21e-1541
forebrain1.21e-1541
anterior neural tube1.21e-1541
future forebrain1.21e-1541
regional part of telencephalon6.58e-1532
cerebral hemisphere7.11e-1532
anatomical cluster1.93e-14373
ectoderm-derived structure1.39e-13171
ectoderm1.39e-13171
presumptive ectoderm1.39e-13171
cerebral cortex6.63e-1225
pallium6.63e-1225
pre-chordal neural plate1.63e-1161
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.33e-11132
regional part of cerebral cortex2.52e-1122
neocortex1.38e-1020
ecto-epithelium9.54e-10104
multi-tissue structure1.91e-09342
gastrointestinal system2.98e-0825
intestine9.79e-0817
posterior neural tube4.46e-0715
chordal neural plate4.46e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#10538318.26835134422770.0002681660105721290.00286868687679428
FOSL2#2355312.69765045342130.000787568572975710.00616958252272803
FOXA1#316938.311064812039090.002740138182109850.0150421703864058
FOXA2#3170318.47284781449890.0002594484187437260.00278255631599671
IRF4#3662316.43588451505810.0003669431395554610.00366098343064891
MEF2A#4205314.0574231822330.0005830038854186610.00489023715277805
PAX5#507935.002174148383370.01196533174786410.0435295834755182
RFX5#599339.035933120396320.002144561191324070.0123914703325419
SMARCB1#6598313.68953683586810.0006305783409379340.00518354752847043
USF1#739134.771124457905970.01370465887188020.0483449593974293
USF2#739239.74414803880220.001718341848410070.0107282343559361



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.