Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3752

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:23, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3752_cerebellum_pineal_brain_small_retinoblastoma_occipital_amygdala



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:12944673..12944691,+p4@MAST1
Hg19::chr19:12944698..12944710,+p3@MAST1
Hg19::chr19:12944722..12944775,+p2@MAST1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neural cell3.67e-0825
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system3.82e-4381
nervous system8.71e-4289
neural tube9.66e-3756
neural rod9.66e-3756
future spinal cord9.66e-3756
neural keel9.66e-3756
brain4.02e-3568
future brain4.02e-3568
regional part of nervous system3.75e-3453
regional part of brain3.75e-3453
neurectoderm7.94e-2786
regional part of forebrain2.19e-2541
forebrain2.19e-2541
anterior neural tube2.19e-2541
future forebrain2.19e-2541
neural plate2.81e-2582
presumptive neural plate2.81e-2582
regional part of cerebral cortex8.60e-2222
cerebral cortex9.17e-2225
pallium9.17e-2225
ectoderm-derived structure4.06e-21171
ectoderm4.06e-21171
presumptive ectoderm4.06e-21171
brain grey matter4.79e-2134
gray matter4.79e-2134
cerebral hemisphere1.09e-2032
telencephalon1.47e-2034
ecto-epithelium1.59e-20104
neocortex1.77e-1920
regional part of telencephalon8.86e-1932
pre-chordal neural plate2.05e-1861
organ system subdivision2.14e-16223
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.22e-16132
posterior neural tube2.04e-1215
chordal neural plate2.04e-1215
segmental subdivision of hindbrain5.94e-1012
hindbrain5.94e-1012
presumptive hindbrain5.94e-1012
adult organism2.27e-09114
segmental subdivision of nervous system5.73e-0913
gyrus7.23e-096
brainstem1.12e-086
limbic system1.02e-075
temporal lobe1.27e-076
regional part of metencephalon8.02e-079
metencephalon8.02e-079
future metencephalon8.02e-079
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer7.99e-18143
cancer7.08e-14235
disease of cellular proliferation4.09e-13239
carcinoma1.29e-10106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0325268468612778
SMARCB1#6598212.16847718743830.008675002221921740.0329853481288559
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0329256481342662
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109384845166312



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.