Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2377

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:27, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2377_pineal_occipital_peripheral_Astrocyte_parietal_skeletal_diaphragm



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:49891062..49891082,-p@chr16:49891062..49891082
-
Hg19::chr16:49891086..49891107,-p@chr16:49891086..49891107
-
Hg19::chr16:49891112..49891125,-p@chr16:49891112..49891125
-
Hg19::chr16:49891128..49891158,-p@chr16:49891128..49891158
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neurectodermal cell2.28e-0959
neural cell1.45e-0725
neuronal stem cell1.57e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.90e-3681
nervous system8.09e-3689
adult organism2.13e-34114
neurectoderm9.93e-3286
neural tube1.72e-3156
neural rod1.72e-3156
future spinal cord1.72e-3156
neural keel1.72e-3156
regional part of nervous system2.64e-2953
regional part of brain2.64e-2953
neural plate4.49e-2982
presumptive neural plate4.49e-2982
brain3.98e-2768
future brain3.98e-2768
ectoderm-derived structure3.04e-24171
ectoderm3.04e-24171
presumptive ectoderm3.04e-24171
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.69e-23132
regional part of forebrain3.43e-2341
forebrain3.43e-2341
anterior neural tube3.43e-2341
future forebrain3.43e-2341
ecto-epithelium3.28e-21104
pre-chordal neural plate1.00e-2061
brain grey matter8.13e-1934
gray matter8.13e-1934
telencephalon1.01e-1834
cerebral hemisphere1.13e-1732
anatomical cluster1.42e-17373
regional part of telencephalon1.44e-1732
organ system subdivision2.46e-17223
cerebral cortex3.45e-1425
pallium3.45e-1425
neocortex9.05e-1320
regional part of cerebral cortex1.73e-1222
multi-cellular organism1.11e-10656
tube7.59e-10192
embryo1.09e-09592
posterior neural tube2.23e-0915
chordal neural plate2.23e-0915
multi-tissue structure2.97e-09342
anatomical conduit1.18e-08240
cell layer2.11e-08309
germ layer2.83e-08560
germ layer / neural crest2.83e-08560
embryonic tissue2.83e-08560
presumptive structure2.83e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure2.83e-08560
epiblast (generic)2.83e-08560
embryonic structure2.95e-08564
epithelium5.54e-08306
organ part8.54e-08218
developing anatomical structure8.84e-08581
segmental subdivision of hindbrain2.52e-0712
hindbrain2.52e-0712
presumptive hindbrain2.52e-0712


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066445.360256373075030.001211145381643620.00816702043604586
JUND#372746.994663941871030.000417684217818580.00391408901074515
RAD21#5885410.35503389545638.6948481184721e-050.00129264233828485
REST#597849.650028716128020.0001152825614219170.00156893346785817
TCF7L2#6934410.77017656313737.42969445082454e-050.00115331429659581
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.00248584723964432



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.