Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2548

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:35, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:22026502..22026538,+p2@C920009B18Rik
Mm9::chr10:22026541..22026544,+p4@C920009B18Rik
Mm9::chr10:22026547..22026576,+p3@C920009B18Rik


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system9.77e-3148
immune system9.77e-3148
hematopoietic system6.29e-2945
blood island6.29e-2945
hemopoietic organ3.14e-2029
immune organ3.14e-2029
thymus2.33e-1723
neck2.33e-1723
respiratory system epithelium2.33e-1723
hemolymphoid system gland2.33e-1723
pharyngeal epithelium2.33e-1723
thymic region2.33e-1723
pharyngeal gland2.33e-1723
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.33e-1723
thymus primordium2.33e-1723
early pharyngeal endoderm2.33e-1723
pharynx3.45e-1624
gland of gut3.45e-1624
upper respiratory tract3.45e-1624
chordate pharynx3.45e-1624
pharyngeal arch system3.45e-1624
pharyngeal region of foregut3.45e-1624
lateral plate mesoderm3.87e-1687
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.53e-1435
segment of respiratory tract3.12e-1327
connective tissue9.23e-1346
respiratory tract1.87e-1241
respiratory system7.34e-1242
musculoskeletal system1.62e-1032
mesoderm5.26e-10120
mesoderm-derived structure5.26e-10120
presumptive mesoderm5.26e-10120
organ segment7.84e-1035
bone marrow3.57e-0916
foregut8.96e-0880
bone element1.16e-0722
skeletal element1.16e-0722
skeletal system1.16e-0722
craniocervical region1.41e-0736
unilaminar epithelium4.51e-0766


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}