Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1864

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:09, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1864_argyrophil_merkel_small_gastrointestinal_smallcell_migratory_nonsmall



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:20345174..20345187,+p@chr20:20345174..20345187
+
Hg19::chr20:20345188..20345217,+p@chr20:20345188..20345217
+
Hg19::chr20:20348740..20348757,+p1@INSM1
Hg19::chr20:20351080..20351098,+p@chr20:20351080..20351098
+
Hg19::chr8:145753950..145753973,-p3@C8orf82


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0031018endocrine pancreas development0.00662310137760508
GO:0031016pancreas development0.00662310137760508
GO:0035270endocrine system development0.0145708230307312



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
Merkel cell4.79e-112
neural cell8.66e-0825
neuron1.03e-076
neuroblast1.03e-076
electrically signaling cell1.03e-076
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system1.02e-1889
central nervous system3.77e-1781
brain1.21e-1468
future brain1.21e-1468
regional part of forebrain8.47e-1341
forebrain8.47e-1341
anterior neural tube8.47e-1341
future forebrain8.47e-1341
regional part of nervous system3.47e-1153
regional part of brain3.47e-1153
pre-chordal neural plate4.66e-1161
telencephalon7.76e-1134
ectoderm-derived structure1.21e-10171
ectoderm1.21e-10171
presumptive ectoderm1.21e-10171
corpus striatum1.25e-104
striatum1.25e-104
ventral part of telencephalon1.25e-104
future corpus striatum1.25e-104
neural tube1.85e-1056
neural rod1.85e-1056
future spinal cord1.85e-1056
neural keel1.85e-1056
cerebral hemisphere1.99e-0932
neural plate8.39e-0982
presumptive neural plate8.39e-0982
ecto-epithelium1.32e-08104
neurectoderm2.95e-0886
regional part of telencephalon1.66e-0732
caudate-putamen4.82e-073
dorsal striatum4.82e-073
brain grey matter5.22e-0734
gray matter5.22e-0734
organ system subdivision7.13e-07223
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
gastrointestinal system cancer1.67e-0814
neuroendocrine tumor1.74e-076
germ cell and embryonal cancer8.04e-0722
germ cell cancer8.04e-0722


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.