Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2672

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:49, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2672_uterus_kidney_nonsmall_smallcell_breast_Osteoblast_Endothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:176981499..176981522,+p2@HOXD10
Hg19::chr2:176981526..176981543,+p3@HOXD10
Hg19::chr2:176981546..176981557,+p5@HOXD10
Hg19::chr2:176985956..176985979,+p@chr2:176985956..176985979
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nephron tubule epithelium1.17e-1510
cavitated compound organ8.07e-1431
excretory tube1.15e-1316
kidney epithelium1.15e-1316
kidney4.83e-1326
kidney mesenchyme4.83e-1326
upper urinary tract4.83e-1326
kidney rudiment4.83e-1326
kidney field4.83e-1326
lymphoid system1.27e-1210
lymphatic vessel1.65e-128
lymph vasculature1.65e-128
lymphatic part of lymphoid system1.65e-128
nephron epithelium4.78e-1215
renal tubule4.78e-1215
nephron tubule4.78e-1215
nephron4.78e-1215
uriniferous tubule4.78e-1215
nephrogenic mesenchyme4.78e-1215
male reproductive organ3.50e-1111
renal system9.48e-1048
duct of male reproductive system3.20e-094
urogenital ridge4.10e-0911
urinary system structure7.64e-0947
reproductive organ8.31e-0948
cortex of kidney1.26e-0712
renal parenchyma1.26e-0712
microcirculatory vessel1.54e-073
endothelium of capillary1.54e-073
capillary1.54e-073
reproductive structure2.38e-0759
reproductive system2.38e-0759
acellular anatomical structure3.22e-073
egg chorion3.22e-073
male genital duct4.53e-073
internal male genitalia4.53e-073
internal genitalia6.17e-0725
extraembryonic membrane8.57e-0714
membranous layer8.57e-0714
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type benign neoplasm9.06e-083
leiomyoma9.06e-083


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.720743
MA0004.12.8475
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.524262
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.16.23635
MA0059.12.50216
MA0060.11.80156
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.841508
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.12.27878
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.11.46638
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.11.08195
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.0247757
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.21.01696
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.551048
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.309472
MA0163.10.253219
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.122011
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#467316.84738089450660.0003409986823655640.00346502835061073
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.0466364401624101
RAD21#588537.766275421592250.0033411193858720.0172692847441892
SUZ12#23512337.58683568329723.12785741999833e-050.00063197968869647
USF1#739134.771124457905970.01370465887188020.0483172152692264
USF2#739239.74414803880220.001718341848410070.0107231061368367



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.