Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1871

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:34, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:124765697..124765711,-p10@Slc16a7
Mm9::chr10:124766013..124766024,-p12@Slc16a7
Mm9::chr19:56494988..56494993,-p@chr19:56494988..56494993
-
Mm9::chr3:95111371..95111381,-p4@Anxa9


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0015355secondary active monocarboxylate transmembrane transporter activity0.0144621872430578
GO:0015711organic anion transport0.017166789799002
GO:0008028monocarboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activity0.017166789799002
GO:0005544calcium-dependent phospholipid binding0.017166789799002
GO:0046943carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activity0.0348985799817907
GO:0005342organic acid transmembrane transporter activity0.0348985799817907



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
zone of skin7.08e-115
skin epidermis7.08e-115
skin of body7.08e-115
integument7.08e-115
surface7.08e-115
outer epithelium7.08e-115
integumental system7.08e-115
enveloping layer of ectoderm7.08e-115
urinary system structure7.29e-1118
renal system3.61e-1019
kidney3.40e-0914
kidney mesenchyme3.40e-0914
upper urinary tract3.40e-0914
kidney rudiment3.40e-0914
kidney field3.40e-0914
cavitated compound organ3.82e-0721


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}