Coexpression cluster:C4421

Full id: C4421_glassy_squamous_colon_nasal_salivary_Prostate_seminal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:48988259..48988270,+	p3@CWH43
Hg19::chr4:48988285..48988298,+	p1@CWH43
Hg19::chr4:48988301..48988312,+	p2@CWH43

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
endo-epithelial cell	5.44e-17	43
general ecto-epithelial cell	6.58e-15	13
respiratory epithelial cell	8.32e-14	13
endodermal cell	6.07e-12	59
acinar cell	9.34e-11	5
epidermal cell	1.97e-09	8
protein secreting cell	7.05e-09	6
stratified squamous epithelial cell	1.18e-08	6
keratin accumulating cell	1.18e-08	6
stratified epithelial cell	1.18e-08	6
keratinizing barrier epithelial cell	1.18e-08	6
epithelial fate stem cell	1.18e-08	6
stratified epithelial stem cell	1.18e-08	6
surface ectodermal cell	1.18e-08	6
epithelial cell of tracheobronchial tree	1.43e-07	9
epithelial cell of lower respiratory tract	1.43e-07	9
keratinocyte	3.21e-07	5
gingival epithelial cell	4.38e-07	3
acinar cell of salivary gland	6.47e-07	3
ecto-epithelial cell	7.06e-07	33
bronchial epithelial cell	8.08e-07	3

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
respiratory system	1.57e-16	72
orifice	1.86e-16	35
endoderm-derived structure	3.16e-16	169
endoderm	3.16e-16	169
presumptive endoderm	3.16e-16	169
oral opening	1.15e-13	21
digestive system	5.32e-13	155
digestive tract	5.32e-13	155
primitive gut	5.32e-13	155
saliva-secreting gland	1.01e-11	6
gland of oral region	1.01e-11	6
gland of foregut	1.01e-11	6
oral gland	1.01e-11	6
oral cavity	1.01e-11	6
gland of gut	3.37e-11	10
mouth	5.83e-11	28
stomodeum	5.83e-11	28
gland	1.01e-10	59
adult organism	1.03e-10	115
surface structure	1.79e-10	95
subdivision of digestive tract	2.90e-10	129
endodermal part of digestive tract	2.90e-10	129
renal system	3.37e-09	45
anatomical space	6.27e-09	104
respiratory tract	1.23e-08	53
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure	1.36e-08	130
urinary system structure	2.63e-08	44
subdivision of head	6.29e-08	48
organ	7.25e-08	511
embryo	7.36e-08	612
mixed ectoderm/mesoderm/endoderm-derived structure	9.64e-08	18
intermediate mesoderm	1.14e-07	37
embryonic structure	1.22e-07	605
developing anatomical structure	1.22e-07	605
male genital duct	1.77e-07	3
internal male genitalia	1.77e-07	3
immaterial anatomical entity	2.15e-07	126
germ layer	3.96e-07	604
embryonic tissue	3.96e-07	604
presumptive structure	3.96e-07	604
epiblast (generic)	3.96e-07	604
gingival epithelium	4.38e-07	3
foregut	7.93e-07	98
lower respiratory tract epithelium	8.08e-07	3
epithelium of bronchus	8.08e-07	3
skin epidermis	8.14e-07	14
outer epithelium	8.14e-07	14
enveloping layer of ectoderm	8.14e-07	14
organism subdivision	9.46e-07	365

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.