Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C658: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0000303!response to superoxide!0.00345873071941599!7351$GO:0000305!response to oxygen radical!0.00345873071941599!7351$GO:0000302!response to reactive oxygen species!0.0124514305898976!7351$GO:0006839!mitochondrial transport!0.0166019074531967!7351$GO:0007005!mitochondrion organization and biogenesis!0.0233464323560579!7351$GO:0006979!response to oxidative stress!0.0233464323560579!7351$GO:0015992!proton transport!0.0233464323560579!7351$GO:0006818!hydrogen transport!0.0233464323560579!7351$GO:0005743!mitochondrial inner membrane!0.0457935947250677!7351$GO:0019866!organelle inner membrane!0.0457935947250677!7351$GO:0031966!mitochondrial membrane!0.0498057223595903!7351$GO:0005740!mitochondrial envelope!0.0498057223595903!7351
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0000303!response to superoxide!0.00345873071941599!7351$GO:0000305!response to oxygen radical!0.00345873071941599!7351$GO:0000302!response to reactive oxygen species!0.0124514305898976!7351$GO:0006839!mitochondrial transport!0.0166019074531967!7351$GO:0007005!mitochondrion organization and biogenesis!0.0233464323560579!7351$GO:0006979!response to oxidative stress!0.0233464323560579!7351$GO:0015992!proton transport!0.0233464323560579!7351$GO:0006818!hydrogen transport!0.0233464323560579!7351$GO:0005743!mitochondrial inner membrane!0.0457935947250677!7351$GO:0019866!organelle inner membrane!0.0457935947250677!7351$GO:0031966!mitochondrial membrane!0.0498057223595903!7351$GO:0005740!mitochondrial envelope!0.0498057223595903!7351
|id=C658
|id=C658
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0000037!8.50e-50!172;CL:0000566!8.50e-50!172;CL:0000988!1.94e-49!182;CL:0002032!8.14e-47!165;CL:0000837!8.14e-47!165;CL:0000738!8.49e-42!140;CL:0002031!7.52e-39!124;CL:0002087!3.80e-38!119;CL:0000763!4.00e-27!112;CL:0000049!4.00e-27!112;CL:0000839!2.89e-20!70;CL:0000557!2.80e-19!71;CL:0000766!4.13e-19!76;CL:0002009!5.88e-19!65;CL:0002194!2.98e-18!63;CL:0000576!2.98e-18!63;CL:0000040!2.98e-18!63;CL:0000559!2.98e-18!63;CL:0000542!1.08e-17!53;CL:0000051!1.08e-17!53;CL:0000838!4.24e-17!52;CL:0000860!4.00e-13!45;CL:0002057!8.24e-13!42;CL:0000945!2.97e-10!24;CL:0000826!2.97e-10!24;CL:0000084!1.82e-07!25;CL:0000827!1.82e-07!25;CL:0000236!7.91e-07!14
|ontology_enrichment_disease=DOID:2531!1.16e-11!51;DOID:0060083!1.16e-11!51;DOID:1240!4.34e-09!39;DOID:8692!1.96e-07!31
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=UBERON:0002390!1.22e-23!102;UBERON:0003061!1.22e-23!102;UBERON:0002193!3.84e-20!112;UBERON:0002371!1.41e-15!80;UBERON:0001474!3.10e-13!86;UBERON:0002405!5.62e-11!115;UBERON:0004765!4.48e-09!101;UBERON:0001434!4.48e-09!101;UBERON:0000178!6.81e-07!15;UBERON:0000179!6.81e-07!15;UBERON:0000463!6.81e-07!15
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:56, 21 May 2012


Full id: C658_Monocytederived_CD4_mycosis_Whole_Neutrophils_mucinous_lymph



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:73685878..73685921,+p1@CU680035
Hg19::chr11:73685925..73685959,-p@chr11:73685925..73685959
-
Hg19::chr11:73685992..73686067,-p@chr11:73685992..73686067
-
Hg19::chr11:73686080..73686092,-p@chr11:73686080..73686092
-
Hg19::chr11:73686156..73686172,-p@chr11:73686156..73686172
-
Hg19::chr11:73686574..73686614,-p@chr11:73686574..73686614
-
Hg19::chr11:73686645..73686687,-p@chr11:73686645..73686687
-
Hg19::chr11:73687727..73687743,-p@chr11:73687727..73687743
-
Hg19::chr11:73687776..73687798,-p@chr11:73687776..73687798
-
Hg19::chr11:73687914..73687931,-p6@UCP2
Hg19::chr11:73687932..73687955,-p4@UCP2
Hg19::chr11:73687967..73687985,-p7@UCP2
Hg19::chr11:73687997..73688019,-p5@UCP2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0000303response to superoxide0.00345873071941599
GO:0000305response to oxygen radical0.00345873071941599
GO:0000302response to reactive oxygen species0.0124514305898976
GO:0006839mitochondrial transport0.0166019074531967
GO:0007005mitochondrion organization and biogenesis0.0233464323560579
GO:0006979response to oxidative stress0.0233464323560579
GO:0015992proton transport0.0233464323560579
GO:0006818hydrogen transport0.0233464323560579
GO:0005743mitochondrial inner membrane0.0457935947250677
GO:0019866organelle inner membrane0.0457935947250677
GO:0031966mitochondrial membrane0.0498057223595903
GO:0005740mitochondrial envelope0.0498057223595903



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell8.50e-50172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell8.50e-50172
hematopoietic cell1.94e-49182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell8.14e-47165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell8.14e-47165
leukocyte8.49e-42140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell7.52e-39124
nongranular leukocyte3.80e-38119
myeloid cell4.00e-27112
common myeloid progenitor4.00e-27112
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.89e-2070
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.80e-1971
myeloid leukocyte4.13e-1976
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.88e-1965
monopoietic cell2.98e-1863
monocyte2.98e-1863
monoblast2.98e-1863
promonocyte2.98e-1863
lymphocyte1.08e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor1.08e-1753
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.24e-1752
classical monocyte4.00e-1345
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte8.24e-1342
lymphocyte of B lineage2.97e-1024
pro-B cell2.97e-1024
T cell1.82e-0725
pro-T cell1.82e-0725
B cell7.91e-0714
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.22e-23102
blood island1.22e-23102
hemolymphoid system3.84e-20112
bone marrow1.41e-1580
bone element3.10e-1386
immune system5.62e-11115
skeletal element4.48e-09101
skeletal system4.48e-09101
blood6.81e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid6.81e-0715
organism substance6.81e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer1.16e-1151
immune system cancer1.16e-1151
leukemia4.34e-0939
myeloid leukemia1.96e-0731


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.