Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4594: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0

Latest revision as of 14:15, 17 September 2013


Full id: C4594_CD14_immature_CD19_Basophils_Dendritic_migratory_Eosinophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:32636121..32636132,-p11@HLA-DQB1
Hg19::chr6:32636145..32636158,-p8@HLA-DQB1
Hg19::chr6:32636163..32636177,-p4@HLA-DQB1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.90e-64136
nongranular leukocyte2.69e-52115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.10e-49120
hematopoietic stem cell1.15e-49168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.15e-49168
hematopoietic cell1.66e-46177
classical monocyte1.88e-4442
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.88e-4442
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.60e-44161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.60e-44161
defensive cell5.30e-3848
phagocyte5.30e-3848
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.48e-3361
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell7.54e-3267
monopoietic cell1.10e-3159
monocyte1.10e-3159
monoblast1.10e-3159
promonocyte1.10e-3159
myeloid leukocyte1.47e-3172
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.26e-3066
myeloid cell2.79e-25108
common myeloid progenitor2.79e-25108
B cell2.59e-1814
stuff accumulating cell7.49e-1887
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.42e-1752
lymphocyte6.35e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor6.35e-1753
mesenchymal cell7.22e-17354
connective tissue cell2.73e-16361
nucleate cell3.93e-1655
motile cell2.93e-14386
dendritic cell4.51e-1410
stem cell1.84e-12441
lymphocyte of B lineage4.33e-1224
pro-B cell4.33e-1224
multi fate stem cell8.88e-12427
somatic stem cell1.95e-11433
Langerhans cell4.65e-115
plasmacytoid dendritic cell1.15e-103
conventional dendritic cell2.93e-098
intermediate monocyte3.03e-099
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.03e-099
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow3.26e-2776
hematopoietic system2.78e-2698
blood island2.78e-2698
bone element1.10e-2482
hemolymphoid system4.46e-23108
immune system1.60e-2293
skeletal element7.68e-2290
skeletal system6.31e-19100
connective tissue1.67e-15371
lateral plate mesoderm2.87e-09203
musculoskeletal system1.59e-08167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0471418
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.118426
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.13.16043
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.12.13518
MA0061.15.21573
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.12.63873
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.13.21605
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.15.90386
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.12.7939
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.0526989
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.11.76247
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.11.60572
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.00160703
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0168286807528722
MEF2A#4205318.74323090964410.0001518243905622470.00195420107541662
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0270725194945896
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173607803558714
RFX5#5993312.04791082719510.0005717246050312580.00486557578429429
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0247732622510805



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C4594&oldid=3071711"