Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4752: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=-0.0926294462496249

Latest revision as of 14:19, 17 September 2013


Full id: C4752_Mast_Basophils_CD8_Neutrophils_CD34_Eosinophils_Natural



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:38758764..38758787,+p5@PLEKHA2
Hg19::chr8:38758806..38758831,+p6@PLEKHA2
Hg19::chr8:38758845..38758875,+p3@PLEKHA2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte1.10e-45136
nongranular leukocyte1.16e-38115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.93e-37120
hematopoietic stem cell1.11e-36168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.11e-36168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.64e-34161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.64e-34161
hematopoietic cell2.89e-33177
myeloid leukocyte3.64e-2772
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.27e-2267
defensive cell3.02e-2048
phagocyte3.02e-2048
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.29e-2066
classical monocyte1.03e-1942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.03e-1942
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.60e-1961
monopoietic cell1.75e-1959
monocyte1.75e-1959
monoblast1.75e-1959
promonocyte1.75e-1959
lymphocyte2.80e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor2.80e-1753
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.66e-1752
myeloid cell1.12e-16108
common myeloid progenitor1.12e-16108
nucleate cell3.42e-1555
mature alpha-beta T cell1.92e-1018
alpha-beta T cell1.92e-1018
immature T cell1.92e-1018
mature T cell1.92e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell1.92e-1018
stuff accumulating cell1.24e-0887
lymphocyte of B lineage1.52e-0824
pro-B cell1.52e-0824
B cell1.95e-0814
T cell6.11e-0825
pro-T cell6.11e-0825
connective tissue cell6.14e-07361
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell6.15e-0711
granulocyte8.93e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.32e-2398
blood island1.32e-2398
bone marrow4.42e-2176
hemolymphoid system2.06e-19108
immune system2.64e-1893
bone element1.13e-1782
skeletal element2.86e-1790
skeletal system5.71e-14100
musculoskeletal system2.01e-12167
lateral plate mesoderm5.34e-10203
connective tissue3.96e-07371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.16.86157
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.14.7105
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.12.4146
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.11.79391
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.11.74184
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.14.67142
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.11.52002
MA0105.10.846801
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.11.12079
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.13.00132
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.22.74132
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.21.2307
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.21.34467
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.11.51687
MA0155.11.31345
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.12.76014
MA0163.110.4767
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.26.90173
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327948357276057
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0324548243107663
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0322688998880226
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0465187739771746
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0168573899924907
ESR1#2099330.76860329615453.43136389821584e-050.000679628701243626
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0109298684038184
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.0063219464978354
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00249675835819526
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00619292259475007



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.