Coexpression cluster:C1716

Full id: C1716_Corneal_oral_Keratinocyte_mesothelioma_Esophageal_Urothelial_anaplastic

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:23451697..23451713,-	p4@AJUBA
Hg19::chr14:23451725..23451742,-	p1@AJUBA
Hg19::chr14:23451753..23451767,-	p2@AJUBA
Hg19::chr14:23451797..23451814,-	p3@AJUBA
Hg19::chr14:23451816..23451828,-	p5@AJUBA

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
epithelial cell	2.21e-51	254
embryonic cell	4.51e-33	248
endodermal cell	8.92e-18	59
endo-epithelial cell	2.97e-16	43
animal cell	1.28e-15	679
eukaryotic cell	1.28e-15	679
squamous epithelial cell	1.54e-15	62
mesodermal cell	1.33e-10	119
non-terminally differentiated cell	5.61e-10	180
epithelial cell of alimentary canal	1.07e-08	21
lining cell	1.90e-08	57
barrier cell	1.90e-08	57
respiratory epithelial cell	6.98e-08	13
epithelial cell of nephron	3.51e-07	16
kidney cell	3.62e-07	18
kidney epithelial cell	3.62e-07	18

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
mesenchyme	2.97e-19	238
entire embryonic mesenchyme	2.97e-19	238
endoderm-derived structure	7.38e-19	169
endoderm	7.38e-19	169
presumptive endoderm	7.38e-19	169
trunk	2.51e-16	216
multi-tissue structure	4.08e-16	347
organism subdivision	4.14e-16	365
digestive system	7.61e-14	155
digestive tract	7.61e-14	155
primitive gut	7.61e-14	155
trunk mesenchyme	1.12e-13	143
unilaminar epithelium	3.89e-12	138
cell layer	1.28e-11	312
multi-cellular organism	1.30e-11	659
epithelium	1.51e-11	309
surface structure	2.44e-11	95
endo-epithelium	2.46e-11	82
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure	2.71e-11	130
subdivision of trunk	8.08e-11	113
urinary system structure	2.42e-10	44
trunk region element	3.69e-10	107
renal system	5.01e-10	45
immaterial anatomical entity	7.07e-10	126
primordium	7.63e-10	168
epithelial tube	1.18e-09	118
subdivision of digestive tract	1.59e-09	129
endodermal part of digestive tract	1.59e-09	129
anatomical system	3.66e-09	625
gut epithelium	6.45e-09	54
anatomical group	6.53e-09	626
abdomen element	8.24e-09	55
abdominal segment element	8.24e-09	55
abdominal segment of trunk	1.66e-08	61
abdomen	1.66e-08	61
ectodermal placode	2.20e-08	29
subdivision of head	3.76e-08	48
anatomical cluster	5.18e-08	286
intermediate mesoderm	6.25e-08	37
foregut	1.04e-07	98
duct	1.73e-07	26
nephron epithelium	3.51e-07	16
nephron	3.51e-07	16
uriniferous tubule	3.51e-07	16
metanephric mesenchyme	3.51e-07	16
nephrogenic mesenchyme	3.51e-07	16
gland	3.73e-07	59
respiratory system	4.53e-07	72
exocrine gland	6.07e-07	31
exocrine system	6.07e-07	31
skin of body	8.39e-07	40
organ part	8.52e-07	219

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
cell type cancer	1.27e-12	143
carcinoma	2.32e-12	106
disease of anatomical entity	7.21e-09	39

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.