Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1077

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:50, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1077_thymus_CD8_Natural_blood_NK_Peripheral_acute



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:87014966..87014973,-p@chr2:87014966..87014973
-
Hg19::chr2:87016482..87016502,-p@chr2:87016482..87016502
-
Hg19::chr2:87017652..87017670,-p@chr2:87017652..87017670
-
Hg19::chr2:87017971..87017982,-p4@CD8A
Hg19::chr2:87017985..87018050,-p1@CD8A
Hg19::chr2:87018060..87018074,-p2@CD8A
Hg19::chr2:87018470..87018477,-p7@CD8A
Hg19::chr2:87088995..87089018,-p1@CD8B


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


p.valueFDRnGenesnPathwayName
2.25318768070372e-050.002852535603770912136Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) (KEGG):04514
7.37072179210596e-060.00198248117124819278Antigen processing and presentation (KEGG):04612
9.39564536136585e-060.00198248117124819288Hematopoietic cell lineage (KEGG):04640
1.41818283432528e-050.002244274335319762108T cell receptor signaling pathway (KEGG):04660
1.46039942267834e-060.000924432834555386235Primary immunodeficiency (KEGG):05340
0.0003198274735665560.03374179846127162511Signaling in Immune system (Reactome):REACT_6900



Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0042288MHC class I protein binding1.94443489268243e-06
GO:0042101T cell receptor complex1.94443489268243e-06
GO:0015026coreceptor activity2.00335716215766e-06
GO:0001772immunological synapse2.00335716215766e-06
GO:0042287MHC protein binding2.98146683544639e-06
GO:0042110T cell activation4.66762578026242e-05
GO:0043235receptor complex5.04627150719965e-05
GO:0046649lymphocyte activation8.79046607733516e-05
GO:0045321leukocyte activation0.000105470862360653
GO:0001775cell activation0.000117549927603074
GO:0007169transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway0.000117549927603074
GO:0007167enzyme linked receptor protein signaling pathway0.000220221982163654
GO:0005102receptor binding0.00243469536960991
GO:0006955immune response0.00297248539808496
GO:0005887integral to plasma membrane0.00332669934433345
GO:0031226intrinsic to plasma membrane0.00332669934433345
GO:0002376immune system process0.00332669934433345
GO:0044459plasma membrane part0.00854199414041754
GO:0007166cell surface receptor linked signal transduction0.00917490442452626
GO:0043234protein complex0.0122393426537342
GO:0004872receptor activity0.0133734696582529
GO:0004871signal transducer activity0.017635448063124
GO:0060089molecular transducer activity0.017635448063124
GO:0005886plasma membrane0.0177636571829853
GO:0032991macromolecular complex0.0177636571829853
GO:0007165signal transduction0.0299540671128367
GO:0019882antigen processing and presentation0.0305786064897416
GO:0007154cell communication0.0325209261041257
GO:0016021integral to membrane0.0444991702929945
GO:0031224intrinsic to membrane0.0444991702929945



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte8.48e-26140
nongranular leukocyte1.12e-19119
hematopoietic stem cell1.59e-17172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.59e-17172
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.10e-16124
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.26e-15165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.26e-15165
hematopoietic cell5.95e-15182
myeloid leukocyte2.88e-1476
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.78e-1342
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell2.41e-1211
mature alpha-beta T cell3.38e-1218
alpha-beta T cell3.38e-1218
immature T cell3.38e-1218
mature T cell3.38e-1218
immature alpha-beta T cell3.38e-1218
classical monocyte1.99e-1145
monopoietic cell1.06e-1063
monocyte1.06e-1063
monoblast1.06e-1063
promonocyte1.06e-1063
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.55e-1065
T cell1.09e-0925
pro-T cell1.09e-0925
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.48e-0971
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.31e-0970
myeloid cell1.44e-08112
common myeloid progenitor1.44e-08112
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.22e-0852
lymphocyte9.11e-0853
common lymphoid progenitor9.11e-0853
granulocyte1.82e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.55e-47115
hematopoietic system1.55e-15102
blood island1.55e-15102
hemolymphoid system1.55e-14112
blood7.85e-0915
haemolymphatic fluid7.85e-0915
organism substance7.85e-0915
bone marrow4.03e-0780
immune system7.30e-07115


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.