Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1886

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:48, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1886_CD14CD16_CD14_CD19_Basophils_CD133_renal_blood



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:182174024..182174027,-p@chr2:182174024..182174027
-
Hg19::chr3:56789155..56789207,-p6@ARHGEF3
Hg19::chr5:56112749..56112774,+p@chr5:56112749..56112774
+
Hg19::chr5:56112822..56112834,+p@chr5:56112822..56112834
+
Hg19::chr6:116783272..116783399,+p1@FAM26F


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte9.36e-67136
hematopoietic stem cell8.97e-63168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell8.97e-63168
nongranular leukocyte3.74e-61115
hematopoietic cell1.32e-57177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.08e-57161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.08e-57161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.33e-56120
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.59e-4561
defensive cell5.12e-4548
phagocyte5.12e-4548
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.31e-4467
classical monocyte1.71e-4442
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.71e-4442
myeloid leukocyte2.28e-4472
monopoietic cell9.28e-4459
monocyte9.28e-4459
monoblast9.28e-4459
promonocyte9.28e-4459
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.31e-4066
myeloid cell2.23e-39108
common myeloid progenitor2.23e-39108
stuff accumulating cell4.16e-1787
lymphocyte2.07e-1553
common lymphoid progenitor2.07e-1553
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell9.07e-1552
nucleate cell1.90e-1455
mesenchymal cell1.35e-12354
B cell1.82e-1214
lymphocyte of B lineage4.96e-1224
pro-B cell4.96e-1224
intermediate monocyte5.08e-129
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte5.08e-129
connective tissue cell9.32e-12361
motile cell6.76e-09386
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system3.71e-4698
blood island3.71e-4698
hemolymphoid system6.82e-45108
bone marrow1.85e-3876
immune system1.78e-3793
bone element4.27e-3482
skeletal element3.24e-2990
skeletal system2.87e-24100
lateral plate mesoderm4.39e-13203
connective tissue2.23e-11371
musculoskeletal system5.72e-08167
blood7.22e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid7.22e-0815
organism substance7.22e-0815


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTBP2#1488225.08680013573130.002461438599678380.0138522570272557



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.