Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3297

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:34, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3297_Monocytederived_CD14CD16_CD14_Macrophage_Dendritic_migratory_splenic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:54891528..54891570,+p1@NCKAP1L
Hg19::chr17:25958204..25958254,+p1@LGALS9
Hg19::chr17:25958269..25958280,+p2@LGALS9


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005534galactose binding0.0060047684822202
GO:0048029monosaccharide binding0.0170100048245901



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell8.85e-70172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell8.85e-70172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.92e-66165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.92e-66165
hematopoietic cell3.65e-64182
leukocyte7.60e-58140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.11e-48124
myeloid cell5.58e-48112
common myeloid progenitor5.58e-48112
nongranular leukocyte1.19e-46119
myeloid leukocyte1.45e-3576
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell6.01e-3371
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell9.15e-3270
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.53e-3065
monopoietic cell1.57e-2963
monocyte1.57e-2963
monoblast1.57e-2963
promonocyte1.57e-2963
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte6.09e-2642
classical monocyte6.11e-2245
lymphocyte3.74e-1553
common lymphoid progenitor3.74e-1553
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.72e-1552
mesenchymal cell3.95e-10358
lymphocyte of B lineage5.75e-0924
pro-B cell5.75e-0924
connective tissue cell8.69e-09365
dendritic cell3.84e-0710
intermediate monocyte3.99e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.99e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system1.05e-37112
hematopoietic system3.85e-36102
blood island3.85e-36102
bone marrow9.04e-2880
immune system1.99e-26115
bone element7.98e-2286
adult organism2.01e-18115
skeletal element9.35e-15101
skeletal system9.35e-15101
lateral plate mesoderm7.62e-14216
connective tissue1.16e-07375
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer8.84e-1351
immune system cancer8.84e-1351
leukemia5.86e-1239
myeloid leukemia8.83e-1131


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.