Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1637

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:15, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1637_CD19_Basophils_CD14_CD14CD16_Peripheral_Mast_CD4



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:60157065..60157091,-p@chr11:60157065..60157091
-
Hg19::chr17:7036237..7036263,-p@chr17:7036237..7036263
-
Hg19::chr3:42108875..42108907,-p@chr3:42108875..42108907
-
Hg19::chr6:25006945..25006954,-p@chr6:25006945..25006954
-
Hg19::chr9:27572810..27572824,+p@chr9:27572810..27572824
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte7.03e-64140
hematopoietic stem cell2.32e-60172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.32e-60172
hematopoietic cell5.36e-57182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.47e-56165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.47e-56165
nongranular leukocyte1.02e-52119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell4.13e-51124
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.27e-3642
myeloid leukocyte3.90e-3576
classical monocyte8.70e-3445
myeloid cell1.42e-33112
common myeloid progenitor1.42e-33112
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.49e-3271
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.45e-3165
monopoietic cell2.34e-2963
monocyte2.34e-2963
monoblast2.34e-2963
promonocyte2.34e-2963
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell9.04e-2970
mesenchymal cell2.32e-24358
connective tissue cell2.62e-23365
motile cell6.81e-20390
lymphocyte1.82e-1953
common lymphoid progenitor1.82e-1953
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.36e-1952
multi fate stem cell1.31e-15430
stem cell3.28e-15444
somatic stem cell1.10e-14436
lymphocyte of B lineage1.02e-1124
pro-B cell1.02e-1124
intermediate monocyte3.96e-109
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.96e-109
B cell3.84e-0914
mature alpha-beta T cell1.78e-0818
alpha-beta T cell1.78e-0818
immature T cell1.78e-0818
mature T cell1.78e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell1.78e-0818
T cell4.92e-0725
pro-T cell4.92e-0725
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.26e-38102
blood island4.26e-38102
hemolymphoid system9.79e-34112
bone marrow7.16e-3280
bone element7.70e-2886
connective tissue3.01e-22375
skeletal element7.31e-21101
skeletal system7.31e-21101
immune system1.16e-20115
lateral plate mesoderm7.05e-09216
blood2.80e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid2.80e-0815
organism substance2.80e-0815


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
MEF2A#4205414.99458472771523.876195075647e-050.000727842390337103
MEF2C#4208216.52454179704960.005579850077982050.0252383699564473
POU2F2#545235.463674434645510.01115650094469780.0410027026837206
SPI1#668846.563458806818180.0009957429636454020.00714002055476568



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.