Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1448

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:17, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1448_CD14_Basophils_Neutrophils_Peripheral_Eosinophils_CD14CD16_Whole



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr18:9775399..9775424,+p@chr18:9775399..9775424
+
Hg19::chr18:9775432..9775441,+p@chr18:9775432..9775441
+
Hg19::chr18:9775444..9775449,+p@chr18:9775444..9775449
+
Hg19::chr18:9775459..9775470,+p@chr18:9775459..9775470
+
Hg19::chr18:9775474..9775475,+p@chr18:9775474..9775475
+
Hg19::chr20:36936152..36936158,-p@chr20:36936152..36936158
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.92e-8142
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.92e-8142
defensive cell1.25e-7048
phagocyte1.25e-7048
myeloid leukocyte8.38e-5772
monopoietic cell1.73e-5559
monocyte1.73e-5559
monoblast1.73e-5559
promonocyte1.73e-5559
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.56e-5361
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.71e-4966
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.33e-4867
stuff accumulating cell1.13e-3687
myeloid cell3.16e-36108
common myeloid progenitor3.16e-36108
leukocyte5.46e-35136
nongranular leukocyte7.29e-34115
hematopoietic stem cell2.94e-27168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.94e-27168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.34e-27120
hematopoietic cell1.39e-25177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.79e-24161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.79e-24161
intermediate monocyte1.52e-109
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.52e-109
mesenchymal cell7.87e-10354
connective tissue cell1.60e-09361
single nucleate cell6.40e-093
mononuclear cell6.40e-093
motile cell1.96e-08386
basophil2.11e-083
multi fate stem cell4.20e-07427
somatic stem cell6.41e-07433
granulocyte6.63e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.09e-4398
blood island1.09e-4398
bone marrow4.17e-4276
hemolymphoid system3.63e-39108
bone element1.09e-3882
immune system1.88e-3693
skeletal element7.77e-3590
skeletal system7.11e-31100
lateral plate mesoderm2.85e-18203
musculoskeletal system1.74e-16167
mesoderm9.78e-10315
mesoderm-derived structure9.78e-10315
presumptive mesoderm9.78e-10315
connective tissue4.22e-09371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.