Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3041

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:53, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3041_CD14_maxillary_Dendritic_Macrophage_Monocytederived_alveolar_umbilical



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:72576021..72576064,+p3@SGPL1
Hg19::chr10:72576095..72576115,+p7@SGPL1
Hg19::chr10:72576134..72576161,+p9@SGPL1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow1.66e-1176
bone element8.93e-1182
immune system1.13e-1093
skeletal element3.42e-1090
organ4.67e-09503
hematopoietic system1.69e-0898
blood island1.69e-0898
skeletal system3.87e-08100
hemolymphoid system1.95e-07108
multi-cellular organism5.78e-07656
embryo8.56e-07592


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0323470550069674
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0318970228052689
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0459905110059936
ETS1#211339.728760922202340.001085840092584840.00759673455449275
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108269611294134
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0293135804351861
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.026850462704855
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0275333167849913
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0327824026491322
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0108921941183869



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.