Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3146

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:01, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3146_acute_CD133_CD34_chronic_biphenotypic_myelodysplastic_granulocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:33913475..33913549,-p5@LMO2
Hg19::chr1:45189400..45189461,+p1@C1orf228
Hg19::chr6:110796700..110796758,+p@chr6:110796700..110796758
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell8.18e-82172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell8.18e-82172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.37e-76165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.37e-76165
hematopoietic cell1.96e-75182
leukocyte1.79e-59140
myeloid cell1.31e-53112
common myeloid progenitor1.31e-53112
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.24e-53124
nongranular leukocyte4.65e-51119
myeloid leukocyte3.68e-3576
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.93e-3371
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.06e-3370
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor9.48e-3065
monopoietic cell2.03e-2963
monocyte2.03e-2963
monoblast2.03e-2963
promonocyte2.03e-2963
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.91e-2942
classical monocyte9.38e-2645
lymphocyte2.28e-1853
common lymphoid progenitor2.28e-1853
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.41e-1852
mesenchymal cell3.21e-11358
mature alpha-beta T cell3.08e-1018
alpha-beta T cell3.08e-1018
immature T cell3.08e-1018
mature T cell3.08e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell3.08e-1018
connective tissue cell3.56e-10365
T cell1.22e-0925
pro-T cell1.22e-0925
lymphocyte of B lineage1.80e-0824
pro-B cell1.80e-0824
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell8.64e-0811
B cell1.34e-0714
motile cell3.04e-07390
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.75e-37102
blood island2.75e-37102
hemolymphoid system5.98e-33112
bone marrow4.80e-2880
bone element3.56e-2486
immune system5.89e-19115
skeletal element2.29e-17101
skeletal system2.29e-17101
adult organism5.58e-16115
connective tissue1.44e-09375
blood1.09e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid1.09e-0715
organism substance1.09e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid leukemia5.77e-1931
leukemia4.41e-1839
hematologic cancer1.07e-1651
immune system cancer1.07e-1651


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.