Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4170

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:35, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4170_Neutrophils_CD14_Eosinophils_CD8_Natural_Whole_lung



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:201984521..201984532,+p@chr2:201984521..201984532
+
Hg19::chr4:185725732..185725733,-p@chr4:185725732..185725733
-
Hg19::chr7:105917287..105917291,-p@chr7:105917287..105917291
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.76e-2542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.76e-2542
leukocyte1.07e-22136
defensive cell5.43e-2248
phagocyte5.43e-2248
natural killer cell1.35e-213
pro-NK cell1.35e-213
myeloid leukocyte2.62e-2172
nongranular leukocyte3.86e-20115
intermediate monocyte1.95e-199
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.95e-199
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell4.10e-19120
hematopoietic stem cell1.38e-17168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.38e-17168
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.45e-1766
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.87e-1767
monopoietic cell4.20e-1759
monocyte4.20e-1759
monoblast4.20e-1759
promonocyte4.20e-1759
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.03e-16161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.03e-16161
hematopoietic cell1.77e-16177
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.79e-1661
myeloid cell3.10e-13108
common myeloid progenitor3.10e-13108
stuff accumulating cell4.90e-1187
neutrophil9.62e-113
innate effector T cell5.82e-081
immature NK T cell5.82e-081
effector T cell5.82e-081
mature NK T cell5.82e-081
immature NK T cell stage IV5.82e-081
immature NK T cell stage I5.82e-081
immature NK T cell stage II5.82e-081
immature NK T cell stage III5.82e-081
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow6.17e-1576
hematopoietic system1.02e-1498
blood island1.02e-1498
bone element1.16e-1382
immune system1.31e-1393
hemolymphoid system4.39e-13108
skeletal element3.16e-1290
skeletal system9.43e-11100
lower lobe of right lung1.75e-081
right lung lobe1.75e-081
lower lobe of lung1.75e-081
lobe of lung1.75e-081
right lung1.75e-081
substantia nigra5.07e-081
midbrain nucleus5.07e-081
regional part of midbrain5.07e-081
midbrain5.07e-081
presumptive midbrain5.07e-081
midbrain neural tube5.07e-081


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.